by emptywheel
There's an interesting case study going on over at the Senate Commerce Committee. The Committee is trying to write legislation to return the Consumer Product Safety Commission to its former strength so it can prevent things like lead-filled toys from entering the toddler chew chain. Yet the Commission's acting head, Nancy Nord, is trying to preserve the Norquistian "ideal" of small government--she's objecting to Senate plans to give her Commission more money and other resources.
The nation’s top official for consumer product safety has asked Congress in recent days to reject legislation intended to strengthen the agency, which polices thousands of consumer goods, from toys to tools.
On the eve of an important Senate committee meeting to consider the legislation, Nancy A. Nord, the acting chairwoman of the Consumer Product Safety Commission, has asked lawmakers in two letters not to approve the bulk of legislation that would increase the agency’s authority, double its budget and sharply increase its dwindling staff.
Ms. Nord opposes provisions that would increase the maximum penalties for safety violations and make it easier for the government to make public reports of faulty products, protect industry whistle-blowers and prosecute executives of companies that willfully violate laws.
I'm sure it will surprise no one reading that Nord was not chosen for a life-long affiliation with consumer interests?
Ms. Nord, who before joining the agency had been a lawyer at Eastman Kodak and an official at the United States Chamber of Commerce,
The Administration is also having Allen Hubbard write a letter to express concern, no doubt, that if Mattel has to stop selling toys with lead, the entire economy will collapse. As if it weren't collapsing on Greenspan's ARM bubble already.
It'll be an interesting fight. Average Americans find it hard to mobilize to do things like oppose war. But many otherwise apathetic Americans will mobilize when you tell them--as Nord has--that it's "not practical" to remove all the lead from the toys their kids are playing with.
The recent spate of food and product problems provide easy proof that Grover Norquist's drowning government doesn't work. It'll be interesting to see how consumers respond if they learn that the woman their taxes pay to keep their kids safe refuses to do her job.
Silly EW. You think this is all about money and protecting big business....
The beauty of lead in bibs is that it will ensure an abundance of Republican voters for years to come.
Posted by: drational | October 30, 2007 at 10:06
Bush is to the President of the US, as John Bolton is to the UN, as Nancy Nord is to the Consumer Product Safety Commission. All are devoted to destroying the segment of government that they lead and all are incompetent. I understand that Osama has emailed Cheney to allow Egypt to become a nuclear nation in the Middle East and he said he would take it under advisement. It is amazing to me that we can spent over $50 billion on intelligence in the US in 2007 and we have none.
Posted by: NC Dem | October 30, 2007 at 10:10
I saw this last night and almost keeled over. When was the last time a department head, a bureaucrat, actively and aggressively lobbied against getting more money and resources for their little bureaucracy? I have heard of the White House, or congressional factions, or other factions, arguing that a certain department doesn't need what is being contemplated, but never the actual head of that department. After all this time, I can still be surprised and shocked almost every day with how bad this Presidency is.
Posted by: bmaz | October 30, 2007 at 11:06
Last week I attended a seminar by Mark Shapiro who's new book Exposed (http://centerforinvestigativereporting.org/) discusses different policies between the EU and the US on toxic chemicals. In short he explained how the EU has replaced the US as the driving force behind environmental and product safety laws, motivated primarily by their need to keep costs low for their universal health care programs. He futher went on to describe that at the moment we have a dual system for consumer products where safer products are sold in Europe while their more toxic counterparts are sold here. The question then becomes will we join the EU and require improved product safety or will we maintain the dual system we have now?
Posted by: phred | October 30, 2007 at 11:19
One other thing Shapiro discussed, when the EU Parliament was considering their more stringent requirements on toxic chemicals in cosmetics, K Street pretty much moved en masse to Brussels to try to talk them out of it. As you might imagine, they didn't much appreciate American interference in their affairs...
Posted by: phred | October 30, 2007 at 11:21
I sure hope this makes more of an impression on people than past GOP anti-government actions. (Some campaigning from the Dems blaming lead in toys on the Bush Administration instead of cheap attacks on China might help.)
One of the most infuriating aspects of the conservative movement (starting with Reagan, at least) has been the shift from campaigning on promises to eliminate agencies they didn't like (and losing, because voters didn't agree) to just appointing people who would undermine the mission of the agency without ever admitting what they're doing.
Posted by: Redshift | October 30, 2007 at 11:57
I know this is very serious stuff, but I got a big laugh out of your post's title.
Posted by: dipper | October 30, 2007 at 12:13
I know this is very serious stuff, but I got a big laugh out of your post's title.
Posted by: dipper | October 30, 2007 at 12:13
I know this is very serious stuff, but I got a big laugh out of your post's title.
Posted by: dipper | October 30, 2007 at 12:15
dipper
I was pretty proud of it myself. Thanks.
Posted by: emptywheel | October 30, 2007 at 12:34
On a hearing I saw, Nord would not answer repeated questions from the female Senator (sorry, can't think of her name at the moment)about whether she agreed she needed more people and money. Nelson of Florida at last told the frustrated questioner that the White House does not allow Nord to say she needs more resources. Honest!
Posted by: Sally | October 30, 2007 at 13:31
The no/reduced lead in toys program is an indirect assault on imports from China, as well as an attempt to improve public health by reducing preventable exposure to harmful substances.
US manufacturers and distributors - the vast majority of the world's toys, including Disney's, come from China - won't want to revise their manufacturing standards and inspection processes or incur higher costs from enforcing such changed regulations. Ms. Nord is carrying BushCo's water in fighting for their interests and against US consumers and public health. SOP for Dubya and Big Dick.
China is the great dumping ground for lead, a staple in manufacturing for centuries. Among other things, it's where tens of millions of US, European and Asian computers, CRT's, televisions, and other products containing large amounts of lead end up for "recycling". Its environmental regulations and manufacturing processes, in practice, deal poorly with lead contamination. (Though as the source of many electronic products complying with EU lead-free manufacturing standards, its best manufacturers are capable of meeting or exceeding worldwide standards.)
Of course, those umpteen hundreds of billions of dollars in US government debt (which only higher taxes will ever repay) held by the Chinese government has nothing to do with US foreign or economic or public health policies. Nothing at all.
Posted by: earlofhuntingdon | October 30, 2007 at 14:11
Ref my 1331, the female senator questioning Nord was Clair McCaskill.
Posted by: Sally | October 30, 2007 at 15:40