« Why Would DOJ Oppose Net Neutrality ... Now? | Main | How to lose our national edge in science »

September 07, 2007

Comments

They ought to issue a subpoena just because of that non-answer. If nothing else, he shows a remarkable lack of unserstanding of the English language. (I'm sure he knew exactly what was being asked.)

Michael Emmick out as head of Lewis investigation; DOJ Main forcing him to retire under a provision they had previously been waiving for him. The obstruction of justice continues on and on (not that Emmick is any loss, he isn't; just that this is cover for further delay and obstruction).

Peter Keisler out as of September 21 as well. Who the hell is still there besides Clement?

bmaz

Yeah, I'm going to come back to Emmick later this weekend. Curious that they're going to such lengths to protect Lewis, while everyone whom Abramoff touched is purportedly going down.

"Dodge" doesn't seem quite the word for it. He is flat blowing the committee off. They don't call it "contempt" for nothing--these guys are all responding late, incompletely, and contemptuously. And the age-old question comes yet again--What is Leahy prepared to do about it?

Cheney. At some point, the San Diego and LA cases intersect at a ganglion that contains Goss, Foggo, Cunningham etc. and leads in a straight line to 4th Branch.

"he sure dodged answering that very specific question."

In this age of lies and liars, thier obfuscation is often the best evidence of their conspiracy.

Wherever Schlotzie avoids direct answers, it represents a smoking gun or a mushroom cloud being covered-up, or some sort of intra-DOJ conspiracy. We can follow their trail of lies, like breadcrumbs through the woods, and it will paint a whole picture.

It wouldn't be very hard to rack up all the obvious lies and half-truths that Goodling, Sampson, and the rest of this wayward cast of characters have cursed us all with.

A whole picture of patent deception begins to be unveiled by these pieces, a conspiracy so broad and pervasive that now it can not be secreted away by their conspiracy. Their denials become admissions, whenever they fudge an answer, just read between the lines, if they are fudging, it means they are covering up the conspiracy.

Like I said before, by their lies we will know them.

Their denial has become their confession.

Who the Maize, Black and Blue playing today?

The comments to this entry are closed.

Where We Met

Blog powered by Typepad