« Will Democrats help stem cell research? | Main | Useful Details about Armitage Might Be In There »

July 17, 2007


Danm good qustion EW

In a CIA prison?

EPU'd from an earlier thread. Seems relevant here, re. pushback against "rogue" CIA people - like McCarthy:

Headline story on Raw Story as I type:

"Fox guest claims CIA 'sabotaging our own War on Terror'"

Lead graph:

Fox News on Tuesday interviewed veteran Pentagon reporter Rowan Scarborough about his "startling allegation" that "elements within the CIA are sabotaging our own War on Terror." Scarborough, a former columnist for the Reverend Sun Myung Moon-owned Washington Times, is the author of Sabotage: America's Enemies Within the CIA, which claims that "CIA bureaucrats are undermining President Bush and the War on Terror through disinformation, incompetence, and outright sabotage."


"That, I think, gives you a little peak inside to the bureaucracy at Langley and how anti-Bush it is, and how they will do things like leak the existence of programs or leak false allegations against Vice-President Cheney or John Bolton," Scarborough added.


According to Scarborough, his book, which criticizes the CIA for its reluctance to cooperate with Doug Feith's Office of Special Plans in its cherry-picking of intelligence during the run-up to the Iraq War, was inspired by "Peter Hoekstra, the ranking Republican on the House Intelligence Committee. He wrote a private letter to Bush, warning him that the CIA was undermining what he was trying to do."


EW, which committee would be the appropriate one to interview McCarthy? Waxman's? One of the intelligence committees? Just curious, 'cause I would love to send email to the appropriate members of Congress. In addition to restoring habeus corpus, I would dearly love to shine a bright light on the secret prisons, shut 'em down, and see prosecutions of EVERYONE from Bush on down who approved of them and/or actively participated in the arrests and detentions.

"...why aren't we contacting these people?"

for the same reason "we" aren't initiating impeachment proceedings... as russ feingold said yesterday...
"Many of you also wrote that if I recognize that the President and Vice President may have committed impeachable offenses, than it is our responsibility to impeach. As I pointed out, it is the role of the House to impeach, and it is the role of the Senate to try impeachments. But the Constitution left it up to the judgment of members of Congress whether or not moving forward with impeachment is best for the country."
every day that those criminals are left to occupy the white house is yet another day they can spend shitting on the constitution... we are in the midst of the most serious constitutional crisis in our nation's history and the congressional leaderhip and the 2008 presidential candidates should be sounding the alarm from every courthouse tower in every county seat in the country... it's getting to be time to take to the streets...


why aren't we contacting these people

Because no one has addressed the corruption at DOJ and Gonzales - McCarthy can't speak now without looking at criminal proceedings by DOJ.

All prosecutorial authority is vested in a corrupt DOJ. The power to go after, the power to cover up.


I think it relevant to ask because it sure seems like we've got a lot of potential witnesses to Rummy's abuse out there, just waiting to speak to the appropriate authority. Now that we're in the majority, why aren't we contacting these people?


Indeed, Why aren't we doing lots of things. Russ Feingold, whom I love as one of the country's best leaders, really disappointed yesterday -- but the rationale was absurd: all this legislation the Dems are working on to do the People's work.

You have to wonder if there is any staffer, within Pelosi's or Reid's offices, who is dedicated to tracking issues, like, on a computer, and using intelligent prioritization protocols to keep such things in focus...

So, how much would they have to pay you, Marcy, to take/create that job?

$100k / year

name a number :)

But the Constitution left it up to the judgment of members of Congress whether or not moving forward with impeachment is best for the country."

Oh, I see. Feingold is The Decider now.

Feingold can't impeach because he has to do the work of the country? Isn't that Bush's reasoning?

Bush can't have habeus corpus, can torture, can ignore any law that he pleases, and can commit treason because he has to do the work of the country in the war on terror. My, my the corruption of bush/cheney is corrosive, isn't it? Even Feingold is echoing his corrupt betters.

See where all this unchecked lawlessness goes and what it produces.

F*ck you, Feingold. You are becoming bush.

Personally, I think Marcy is worth at least 2 Karl Roves - so at least 2X $162k. She could be the bicameral oversite czar. ;)

So let's ask Feingold why it's in the best interest of the country to allow an imperial presidency that is above the law -unaccountable to the Constitution, Congress or the American people - to go unchallenged.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Where We Met

Blog powered by Typepad