by emptywheel
As Paul Kiel notes, one of the pieces of news from today's hearing is that James Comey asked two different USAs to resign. Comey didn't say who he had to fire. But it's clear that one of those USAs is Thomas DiBiagio (DiBiagio resigned December 3, 2004, so he's the guy who resigned under Ashcroft). In an article earlier this year, David Margolis confirmed that DiBiagio was asked to step down.
The Justice Department acknowledged yesterday that Thomas M. DiBiagio, the Maryland U.S. attorney who stepped down early in 2005, was forced from office and did not, as he said at the time, decide on his own to leave for personal reasons.
But the department official who asked for his resignation dismissed DiBiagio's claim in a New York Times article yesterday that he was ousted because of political pressure over public corruption investigations into the administration of then-Gov. Robert L. Ehrlich Jr.
[snip]
Margolis said that he asked DiBiagio for his resignation because he had "lost confidence in his abilities" and that he was not aware at the time of any investigations involving the Ehrlich administration. "There were absolutely no political shenanigans," said Margolis, a 42-year department employee who oversees ethics matters.
DiBiagio made a half-baked attempt to yoke his fate with those who were fired last year, suggesting he was ousted because he was looking into corruption on Governor Ehrlich's Administration. But there is plenty of evidence that other things were behind the firing. First, there's the news that DiBiagio demanded at least three high-profile public corruption indictments in time for the 2004 election. Comey followed up on DiBiagio's deman by demanding to review any public indictments he planned to file.
In addition, there's the evidence that Ehrlich's associates actually intervened to try to support DiBiagio.
In fact, the Republican governor's chief legal counsel, Jervis Finney, twice contacted the Justice Department to argue in DiBiagio's behalf, said David Margolis, an associate deputy attorney general. Finney contacted the department in fall 2004, not long after DiBiagio drew a rebuke for ordering his subordinates to produce "front-page" indictments, Margolis said.
Finney, he said, "called me during this process, claiming that I was being too harsh on Tom and that Tom was being railroaded by a bunch of Democrats in the U.S. attorney's office."
There's much more smoke related to DiBiagio, including accusations from one of his AUSAs that DiBiagio's attempts to force out another of his AUSAs contribued greatly to that lawyer's stress before he died in mysterious circumstances.
The confirmation of DiBiagio as one of the two USAs about whom Comey said "it was not a close case" tells there's more story to DiBiagio's firing. Particularly since DiBiagio may have gotten ousted for things that Karl Rove and Monica Goodling would seem to approve of.
Update: There's some great detail in this Baltimore Sun profile of DiBiagio upon his resignation:
In July [2004], The Sun obtained e-mails that DiBiagio wrote to his staff asking for three "front page" indictments for public corruption or white-collar crimes by November, and complaining about the pace of cases against elected officials.
The next day, the Justice Department told him all future public corruption cases from his office must be reviewed and approved by Washington to protect the office's credibility.
[snip]
In a case that angered Democrats, DiBiagio indicted Stephen P. Amos, a former director of the Governor's Office of Crime Control and Prevention, on charges that he had misused grant money. Amos has pleaded not guilty. The office was overseen by former Lt. Gov. Kathleen Kennedy Townsend, a Democrat who lost the governor's race to Gov. Robert L. Ehrlich Jr. in 2002.
Ehrlich, a Republican who has long been friends with DiBiagio, recommended him for the U.S. attorney job while a congressman.
A running theme of DiBiagio's tenure has been criticism from [Baltimore Mayor Martin] O'Malley. The Democratic mayor argued that DiBiagio did not pursue enough of the city's gun cases in the federal system, where juries tend to be tougher on crime.
Update 2: It seems highly likely the second fired (for cause) USA was David York, the USA for the Southern District of Alabama before Deborah Rhodes. He apparently resigned on September 30, 2005, after the Alabama Mobile-Register reported he was the subject of an internal DOJ probe. I'm looking for the report to see if it specified what the probe was about.
I appreciate the clarification of the term "loyalty oath."
Jodi
Posted by: Jodi | May 03, 2007 at 14:54
Placeholder to see if I can close the italics tag
Posted by: William Ockham | May 03, 2007 at 15:09
Thanks for the background on DeBiagio, EW. It would be interesting to know even more details about his actions before his firing. Maybe one day they will be leaked.
Posted by: Quzi | May 03, 2007 at 15:11
Darn, should have done a view source. There were two opening italic tags
Posted by: William Ockham | May 03, 2007 at 15:18
Please remind me why Comey resigned from DOJ. Did he jump or was he pushed? Seriously.
Posted by: Markinsanfran | May 03, 2007 at 15:18
This may be old news to those who've been more attentive than I, but stuff seems to be coming into sharper relief.
First, we've got the basic hypothesis that there were direct efforts to corrupt & politicize DoJ so that it could function as an arm of Karl's Shop.
Then, one can believe that "straight arrows" like Comey, Iglesias, et al, were unwelcome at DoJ and pushed out, either directly, or because they were marginalized, or by virtue of their own disgust. On the other hand, "loyal Bushies" are those who would either help Karl & his shop or would look the other way why Karl's minions did their dirty work.
OK. So here's another timeline, all from Wiki (hi, EW!):
--Ashcroft departed 2/05
--Comey announced his departure 4/05, left 8/05
--Abu started 2/3/05
Hard as it may be to believe, was Ashcroft, relatively speaking, a "straight arrow"? Too much of one for Karl to have the freedom to do his deeds? IIRC, I was a little surprised that Ashcroft stepped down when he did -- he seemed like quite the Patriot, yet it appeared he'd been pushed out. But maybe he had enough respect for the rule of law that he was interfering with Karl?
Then, WH Counsel Abu relocates to Main Justice, even though he keeps his original job. Comey catches on pretty quick and bails. Just a theory.
On KO the other night, reacting to the news about Abu delegating hiring/firing to Sampson & Gooding, Turley wondered what it is that Abu does all day.
Maybe we know the answer: Nothing. Just as Karl said.
I really want someone to ask Comey -- under oath, so he can speak freely -- why he left, and if there was a difference in DoJ between Ashcroft & Abu.
Posted by: Nola Sue | May 03, 2007 at 15:23
I never thought I would see the day when I would regard Ashcroft as a "good guy" -- but I will say that in my opinion, he always seemed entirely consistent, a true believer's true believer. Hardcore Evangelical Christian Fundamentalist, but one who really walked the talk that he purported to believe in (remember how he drapped the nude statues at the DOJ?). So in that sense, it seems likely that he was a straight arrow in that he was consistent, according to his own internal version of Christian logic. Unlike Goodling & Sampson.
I also seem to remember that Jim Jeffords of Vermont(who was not by any stretch of the imagination a right-winger) was quite fond of him on a personal level when they were Senators together. They were in a barbershop quartet together. In an interview, after he left the Republican Party, he was quoted as saying that he was very sad that his defection interfered with his friendship with Ashcroft. Jeffords was a true straight arrow, in spite of his inherited Republicanism, from which he is now in recovery (he endorsed Bernie Sanders in the election to replace him).
Posted by: Woodhall Hollow | May 03, 2007 at 15:38
Another tidbit for the timeline:
--Abu started 2/3/05 (wiki)
--Comey's 15-minute chat w Sampson about prosecutors who were considered weak managers on 2/28/05 (AP re today's testimony)
Quite a coincidence that conversation happened 3 weeks after Abu & Karl took over.
Posted by: Nola Sue | May 03, 2007 at 15:51
Based on the DiBiagio articles I could find, something else must have happened after the incident of the "three front-page indictments" of public corruption crimes that caused Comey to recommend that DiBiagio be dismissed. DiBiagio actually issued a public statement in July, 2004, after Comey's smackdown, that he understood Comey's concerns and would comply fully with Comey's request that all future public corruption cases be vetted by DOJ first. It is interesting to note that DiBiagio seemed to be bucking the White House orders previous to this time to concentrate on terrorism cases. DiBiagio actually complained that the FBI had become virtually useless in helping to prosecute white-collar crime cases because they were so wrapped up with looking for terrorism cases under every rock.
Posted by: grayslady | May 03, 2007 at 15:56
greyslady
Keep in mind, though, that DiBiagio was definitely playing the press on this. I suspect there's a tremendous amount of disinformation out there on this. And consider what it took for Margolis to admit that DiBiagio was fired, on the record, to refure his leak to Eric Lichtblau that he was fired for no reason.
Posted by: emptywheel | May 03, 2007 at 16:13
DiBiagio is a close friend of then Gov. Ehrlich. Ehrlich was reportedly using gambling money to push for legalizing slot machines in Maryland, but nothing ever came of an investigation into the matter. Ehrlich also had interesting ties to Abramoff. In addition to receiving generous political donations from Jack, there is this:
http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/local/bal-te.md.grassroots04jan04,0,2014639.story?track=mostemailedlink
"Originally published January 4, 2006
"A company founded by Gov. Robert L. Ehrlich Jr.'s deputy chief of staff was central to lobbyist Jack Abramoff's schemes to defraud clients and conceal kickbacks to himself and others, according to federal charges filed yesterday.
"A criminal information filed against the lobbyist says Abramoff used Grassroots Interactive, a purported advocacy and public relations firm based in Silver Spring, 'to charge clients prices that incorporated huge profit margins for the purpose of generating funds for and concealing kickbacks that would be paid to defendant Abramoff.'"
No shenanigans, indeed!
And the Baltimore Sun's articles following the investigation of the death of Jonathan P. Luna read like a murder mystery. It certainly looks like there was a cover-up at multiple levels. If you read these in chronological order, it will make your hair stand on end: http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/local/crime/bal-lunacase,0,6385867.special?coll=bal-local-storyutil
Posted by: Astrid | May 03, 2007 at 16:31
John Dean gave us "Worse Than Watergate". So now we get "Worse Than Ashcroft"?
Superficially the choice here is between:
[1] on the one hand, a product of a religiotically twisted childhood and early education in the brewing of fortified KoolAid, followed by a pretty darn good education after high school, plus very long history success in getting elected and presumably being somewhat responsive to actual citizens, at least until 2000 when his opponent avoided debating him by a clever ruse and the voters of the Show Me state had an opportunity to actually listen to what he had to say, and
[2] on the other hand, a bootlick toady who by mere accident of birth missed out on his true calling as chief of crafts at a concentration camp.
Tough call. But then throw in the evidence that:
[A] on some occasions Captain Rapture actually listened and Did The Right Thing [eg. his long campaign fought from from his Senate seat to get the FBI to drop racial profiling; and a few other things here and there, including being able to understand Comey when Comey said to him "You're in a conflict of interest" and get to FEELING so conflicted first he gave up all tough calls to Comey for a while and then he got sick,
[B] whereas AlG - ever since recruited to bless ever moronic notion that Father Bush and Son Shrub have had with his legalish support - has never deviated - not once - from his unyielding faith in the Laws of Osmosis, and facilitated the carrying out of each and every one of the 57 death penalties King George wanted carried out in Texas, facilitated turning wing nut legalish rationalizations on rendition, torture, whimsical privacy invasion and unitary executive power into official DoJ postions and allowed Karl Rove to determine what activities qualify as worthy of investigation and prosecution as federals crimes,
and you too might get the impression that at least you could save your breath trying to reason with someone with all the passion and foresight of a water logged plant and move on.
Posted by: LabDancer | May 03, 2007 at 16:34
Ms. E. Wheel - That part where DeBiagio wants equal standing with the purged eight seems to be part of a trend - as in, when you can't beat 'em then co-opt 'em.
Rep Rienzi also is claiming that HE'S a victim of DoJ politics - only thing is, it would have to be one of the purged eight [Charlton] going after him.
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/05/02/renzi-interview/
And what about this idea that now that the Dems went all crybaby at the King, and he snarled back with his veto, and those disorganized, didn't-think-it-through Dems lost the vote to set aside the King's veto, the lily-livered wimpy Dems went all weak in the knees so now its the RUBS who have to come in to the rescue and breathe life into the Will of the People from last November.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/02/AR2007050201517_pf.html
Is it just me, or does it seem to anyone else that this is the old DC comic Superman world meets Bizarro Superman world broght to life?
Posted by: LabDancer | May 03, 2007 at 17:42
LabDancer
Yes, DiBiagio's reeks of TurdBlossom, if you ask my opinion. Think about it--it'd be a way to rehabilitate Ehrlich, clear him of his Abramoff-related stench, and at the same time cloud the discussion of the USAs.
Posted by: emptywheel | May 03, 2007 at 17:56
LabDancer:
he IS a victim
renzi got the US Attorney fired, and those fuckers at the DOJ are STILL prosecuting him
the NERVE of those bastards
you just can't get quality political corruption anymore
nostalgia ain't what it used to be
Posted by: freepatriot | May 03, 2007 at 18:04
ew: I love the way your mind works! With this adminstration it never hurts to be more cynical than you think you need to be in evaluating why certain statements are made--or not made.
Posted by: grayslady | May 03, 2007 at 18:15
I do not know the import of this, if any, (because I do not know the party affiliation of the official(s) indicted), but very soon after the appointment of Deborah Rhodes to replace David York as the USA for Southern Alabama, an indictment was unsealed (do not know when the indictment was initially issued) against the Mayor of a municipality called Orange Beach, I believe - - I think his name was Russo. I also don't know if the internal investigation of York had anything at all to do with the Russo case. The original indictment was for campaign money shenanigans, and a superceding indictment then expanded the charges to official corruption in connection with real estate dealings.
Posted by: Robert P. Ewing | May 03, 2007 at 19:01
Robert:
It looks like Steve Russo, the mayor in question, is a Republican (or his only donation at the FEC was to a Republican).
Looking at the indictment now--which was filed
Posted by: emptywheel | May 03, 2007 at 20:03
Just an interested Canadian lurker here, excellent work as usual Ms.Wheeler....something struck me a while ago....
The 'plumbers' in this present day attorney watergate are the DOJ and its minions, in collusion and directed by Rover....obviously Bush43 learned his lessons from Nixon's weakness and went Nixon one better in getting the whole DOJ in his coopted matrix...
It is a singular event that your country may not recover from, as you would have to acknowledge wrongdoing and error and accept the consequences OR accept the fact that you have to start from scratch with respect to law and order there because there is taint involved in your justice institutions....
I am not sure your country is up to it...it is way past time for the intervention, and I would start by calling it that...I do see though that it is extremely hard for certain people in America to stand up to your President, but doing the right thing has never been easy....
Good luck
Posted by: Canadianhoser | May 03, 2007 at 23:15
In the Washington Times article, linked by the word "accusations" the facts in the death of Mr. Luna are the following: he was found dead with 36 stab wounds
he drowned in a ditch
the authorities are considering whether this is a suicide
they are also looking into premeditated murder or a random murder
This man worked for Mr. DiBiagio and there is controversy as to Luna being under improper job pressure from Mr. DiBiagio. The person, Luna's colleague, who lodged complaints about DiBiagio is now working in a new capacity, investigating prosecutorial misconduct and abuse of power.
Posted by: Boston1775 | May 04, 2007 at 07:07
Today Josh Marshall posts an email he received about the murder of another AUSA, this one in Seattle. Is this normal? To have two murdered in the space of a few years? I know they go after some mean characters, but I wouldn't have imagined they get murdered with any great frequency.
USAGate started with people noticing a curiously high rate of "resignations" among USAs. Is it too tin-foilly to start looking systematically for their assistants' murders?
Posted by: mamayaga | May 04, 2007 at 07:47
Jaysus, GOOD WORK Marci. Wish the press dug like you do.
Posted by: annb | May 04, 2007 at 18:49