by emptywheel
I'm still not sure whether Steven Biskupic, the USA of Eastern Wisconsin, was on Gonzales' firing list for the cases he brought--or the cases he didn't. But there's a case (well, it looks like it may morph into a big investigation) that bears watching. It's another one of those casino and influence peddling cases (no, Abramoff doesn't appear to be involved ... at least not that I've found YET). Basically, trucking company executive Dennis Troha and his family gave lots of money to a few people who could do him some favors. He and his family gave big to three Congressmen (Paul Ryan, R-WI, Jim Oberstar, D-MN, and Don Young, R-AK) who supported "saddlemount" truck combinations that benefitted his trucking company. And, he gave big to two Wisconsin politicians (Congressman Paul Ryan, again, and Governor Jim Doyle) who could help him win approval for a casino. Ryan called the BIA to harrass them about accelerating the approval process. And Doyle retains the right to approve casinos. Troha is accused of handing money around to family members so he could evade campaign giving limts.
Now, Biskupic's office indicted Troha at the beginning of March for laundering his political donations through family members. But here's the thing. The indictment only mentions the Doyle donations. It makes no mention of the Ryan donations. Which has made it very easy to paint Troha (who gives big chunks of cash to both sides of the aisle--how many guys do you think gave to Bush in the primary AND Russ Feingold in the general?) as a big Democrat (though I suspect this is the result of a well-orchestrated media campaign--I'd love to figure out who is behind that campaign). But just those Ryan donations coming through family members with the last name Troha amount to over $56,000.
But the selective attention on Troha's Democratic donations appears like it's about to change.
McClatchy reported yesterday that Don Young has lawyered up--to the tune of $25,000, more than he received in donations from Troha in the first place:
Rep. Don Young's campaign has retained a Washington law firm to represent him in connection with campaign contributions from a Wisconsin trucking executive who is now under indictment.
The $25,000 retainer to Akin Gump Strauss Hauer was disclosed over the weekend in quarterly campaign finance reports.
"With all the innuendo, accusations and words that have been out there, I just didn't think it was a bad decision to have some legal counsel and keep them on retainer for basic feedback and second opinion," Young campaign manager Steven Dougherty said Monday.
I'm not sure what to make of the investigation and certainly welcome folks (particularly you regulars from WI) to chime in. But it sure seems like this investigation--which has the appearance of a mini-Abramoff--is heading into both parties.
Semi-related, but Conyers just announced he'd delay the vote on immunity for Goodling until next week, at the request of the GOPpers on the Judiciary Committee.
Looks like Rove placed a few calls to drag this one out at least until after AG AG's appearance. Though it may turn out advantageous.
Posted by: pseudonymous in nc | April 18, 2007 at 10:44
Off topic, but there's an interesting bit at tpmmuckraker.com about the ninety second deliberation before firing Nevada's Daniel Bogden. This is weird, but it supposedly hinged on the fact that he was a fifty year-old single man without a family to support. I couldn't help thinking this is conservative code for the possibility he was gay.
Posted by: SaltinWound | April 18, 2007 at 10:44
SEE THINKPROGRESS FOR SUPREME COURT DECISION UPHOLDING FEDERAL BAN ON PARTIAL BIRTH ABORTION. RUTH BADER GINSBURG’S DISSENT IS BLISTERING, BUT MR. BUSH AND SAMMY ALITO GOT THERE WAY.
Posted by: earlofhuntingdon | April 18, 2007 at 10:49
Akin Gump (any relation to Forrest Gump?) is going to have to start hiring for their new public corruption defense division.
Posted by: Swoosh | April 18, 2007 at 10:51
ew, I'm having trouble opening the "gives big chunks" link.
Posted by: John Casper | April 18, 2007 at 11:03
John Casper -- try this: go to http://query.nictusa.com/fecimg/norindsea.html, then enter Troha, Dennis in the fields.
I note, however, at least using OpenSecrets.org, that Troha gave 25K on two separate occasions during the last election cycle alone to the NRCC. (Hardly bi-partisan, that.) Want to bet there were subsequent donations to key WI candidates from the NRCC? In my experience looking through PAC and party campaign finance reporting, this is often how the money is "laundered"; believe that's what DeLay and Abramoff both did with monies, asked donors to contribute to PACs/Party then asked the PAC/Party to redonate money to the intended campaign or issue.
Posted by: Rayne | April 18, 2007 at 11:12
Does anybody know if Steve Biskupic is related to Joan Biskupic--legal reporter for USA Today?
Posted by: despairing | April 18, 2007 at 11:14
Joan is the sister of Steve.
Posted by: Mae | April 18, 2007 at 11:23
Weird, couldn't get the FEC site to respond; when I did, had to use a bunch more filters to get it to pull data. All data for Dennis Troha at Kenosha WI 53144 in FEC site came to $126,800 - yet OpenSecrets.org, pulling data from FEC, pull up $134,300 total.
Of that, $63,300 was donated in 2005-2006; something very important must have been worth donating nearly as much in that single election cycle as all other donations combined. Interesting; who knew that saddlemount truck combos were such a big deal? (or not...)
The amounts given to Dems, whether PACs or candidates, is substantially less compared to the amounts that Troha gave Repubs; there's also the necessity of proving a qui pro quo. Is it wrong to give to a Senator of one's own state without a qui pro quo? No.
Posted by: Rayne | April 18, 2007 at 11:39
qui should have been quid. Think I need a nap...
Posted by: Rayne | April 18, 2007 at 11:42
FYI
Akin Gump= Ken Melman's firm.
Yep, former GOP chair Melman.
A $25,000 retainer with no specific work load, non refundable "just in case money"?
Uh, guys? When I was doing mafia work, we called this "protection money"
Keep diggin'!
Posted by: looseheadprop | April 18, 2007 at 11:59
Don Lhp is right about this.
Here's the description of the indictment as found in The Capital Times on Monday, March 19, 2007:
>Troha was indicted March 1 on charges of illegally funneling more than $100,000 in campaign donations to Doyle and the federal account of the state Democratic Party.
>The indictment alleges Troha concealed the nature of the transactions in his attempt to obtain approval for a casino in Kenosha and lied to the FBI about it.
>Troha, the former owner of a major trucking firm now at the center of a multistate tax dispute, has pleaded not guilty.
>The FBI is investigating help Troha received from the state Department of Transportation while his trucking firms were attempting to resolve more than $1 million in disputed fuel tax payments owed to other states."
My comment: So Troha's contributions were "illegally funneled" (other stories say that he violated state campaign donation limits) to the Dems -- were they made legally to the Republicans? Emptywheel seems to indicate that the answer is no.
There was also a good article on the Bush donations in the Wisconsin State Journal on Thursday, March 22, 2007, where they point out that Doyle had to approve the Kenosha casino, but Bush did too. Was Biskupic investigating the Bush donations?
>"Michelle Jacobs, a spokeswoman for U.S. Attorney Steven Biskupic in Milwaukee, wouldn't comment on whether authorities are looking at the Bush donations.
"We've tried to make clear that the investigation from our end continues, but we are not going to comment on each and every specific thing that's raised with us," she said."
My comment: Indeed, after Thompson was freed, he might suddenly choose to pursue cases against Republicans! But for all those people that wondered if Biskupic was simply fooled (and the liberal Capital Times has been careful not to assume too much), if it is true that Republican contributions were also illegally funneled through family members, and Biskupic chose just to talk about the Democrats, then they can stop wondering.
Posted by: MarkC | April 18, 2007 at 12:32
Thanks Rayne.
Posted by: John Casper | April 18, 2007 at 12:33
First Rule
All Politicians are dirty.
Second and other Rules
Refer in all matters to First Rule
Posted by: Jodi | April 18, 2007 at 13:33
Jodi, you are such a good little minder. How much do they pay you, I wonder? By the day, by the comment? Obviously not by the content.
Posted by: Rayne | April 18, 2007 at 13:48
On Bogden, "fifty year-old single man without a family to support" might also be an allusion to his having no additional loyalties or responsibilities which would keep him in line, maybe he was about to go after some RNCers.
Posted by: kim | April 18, 2007 at 14:29
Rule 1: Ignore all of Tokyo Jodi's comments.
Rule 2: When in doubt, refer back to rule 1.
Posted by: John Casper | April 18, 2007 at 14:50
There Casper, now yer gettin it!
Posted by: greenhouse | April 18, 2007 at 14:59
FOlks,
When you're looking at Troha's donations, you have to look at the entire family. And remember, this is just those with Troha as the last name--he has at least one married daughter who should be in there as well.
I don't know if the Republican donations were legal or not--frankly, a TON of people max out through their families (there's a retired guy in my neighborhood who, given his age, must have paid 5 figures for his house, and he regualrly maxes out to the Republican party. His last name is Koch, which is probably why he's giving more than he apparently makes). So I don't know how strong his case is against Troha on the Dem giving. But there sure does seem to be a quid attached to all that quo.
Posted by: emptywheel | April 18, 2007 at 15:07
FBI raids Doolittle's home. I guess they should've fired the VA USA too.
Posted by: obsessed | April 18, 2007 at 16:44
My impression is that this is playing out as a bipartisan problem here. The Milwaukee Journal seems to be taking the opinion that Troha's contributions to Doyle were the known quantity, but the unknown was how much he gave to Republicans. Last I heard, they'd figured out it was a lot more than to Dems.
Posted by: pastordan | April 18, 2007 at 18:02
EW -- yeah, I hear you about the entire family; we've seen it numerous times in other races. A certain family in IN, for example, each gave Lieberman their legal limit in the last minutes before CT's primary, for example; if memory serves, 4 or 5 kids under the age of 25 all decided simultaneously to make limit-out donations at the same time as mom and dad. Hmm. In this case, though, all the family member shared the same last name and address of report. In the Troha Tribe situation, there will be multiple names and likely numerous addresses.
But my scan of the donations on Dennis Troha alone told me there needs to be a check by date of NRCC donations outbound to WI candidates within days of Troha's donations; how did he just happen to hit near or on end of quarter twice with his 25K donations? Did he have a good quarter himself at JTC, or did he get instructions to make his donations at a particular time? The next question is whether the family members also made donations in sync with his -- not unlike the ones that family from IN made to Lieberman that are now part of the 300K of iffy campaign funds that FEC and DOJ should now be looking through carefully.
I won't get to the family members until after I get through the NRCC donations; the size of the file I'm trying to pull down has choked and crashed my desktop 5 times today, working on pulling it down now on my laptop. Will use the file to look for the trends in donations from NRCC to WI and then backtrack NRCC contributors from WI to see if I have a match.
As for the donations to Dem candidates/incumbents: they look pretty innocuous. Enough to get attention but not much considering Troha by himself has dumped 50K to Repubs in one election cycle alone. He either couldn't game the system and stuck to traditional campaign donations, or he didn't have peeps in place to support what he wanted to do, all a matter of timing. What I don't understand is why this guy simply didn't go the route of becoming a Bush Pioneer and ask the Bushies to railroad what he needed through the system; goodness knows it's worked reliably for a lot of other Pioneers. Democratic governor? Feh. Change legislation as a work around. You know they probably tried it in neighboring states with Repub majorities in state legislature.
Posted by: Rayne | April 18, 2007 at 21:40
In case anybody else wants to poke around in FEC records, here are some names with which to start:
Troha, Dennis M.
Kenosha 53144
Troha, Natalie K.
Kenosha 53144
Troha, Jennifer
Kenosha 53142
Troha, Bradley M.
Kenosha 53144
Troha, Cynthia A.
Pleasant Prairie 53158
Troha, Jim
Kenosha 53144
Troha, Leslie A.
Kenosha 53140
Troha, Lynn M.
Kenosha 53144
Troha, Matthew T.
Kenosha 53142
Troha, Nicole
Kenosha 53143
Troha, Patty
Kenosha 53144
Troha, Todd A
Kenosha 53142
I do not have confirmation that these folks are all family members, nor do I have ID's of family members with surname other than Troha. But the majority of these folks list the same employers or are students, housewives.
Posted by: Rayne | April 18, 2007 at 22:20
From opensecrets.org:
TROHA, DENNIS M MR
KENOSHA,WI 53144
J H T TRUCKING/CHAIRMAN
3/24/2006
$25,000
National Republican Congressional Cmte
Milwaukee Journal Snetinel columnists Spivak and Bice have an article that shows that Congressman Ryan was in to see the Bureau of Indian Affairs on Feb. 28, 2006 to hammer them for approval of the Kenosha casino, three weeks before this donation was given: http://www.jsonline.com/story/index.aspx?id=436051
The article also points out that Troha and his family had already maxed out to Ryan in ’05 at around $31,000, so they could not have given Ryan any more.
Congressman Ryan was in leadership, after they maxed out to him, would this have been where he would have directed the contributions? He would have had a set amount to raise.
Then their is Troha's donation to the RNC
TROHA, DENNIS M MR
KENOSHA,WI 53144
ATC LEASING/OWNER
4/30/2004
$25,000
Republican National Cmte
Almost two weeks later, the RNC transfers $25,000.91 to the Republican Party of Wisconsin. Coincidence?
Posted by: Jessica M | April 19, 2007 at 00:18
Nice work, Jessica. $0.91? What the heck is that, an earmark code? or a way to hide from a search for a 25K donation?
Posted by: Rayne | April 19, 2007 at 03:56
If that is an earmark code, there should be other donations/transfers ending in that amount. That ought to be searchable... and interesting.
Trucking? Any connection to the NAFTA Superhighway? It has a leg from Chicago through Wisconsin, then up to Canada. "NASCO’s lobbying efforts have helped secure more than $500 million in transportation project funding to date."
http://www.nascocorridor.com/
The route is designed to bring cheap goods from China to Mexico, and then run them by truck up through the heartland... avoiding unionized docks, inspections, security regulations, quarantine times... and both coasts of the US.
Trucking companies with access to that route ought to make a mint. Contractors building something 10 lanes wide and hundreds of miles long ought to make a mint, too.
Conservatives are pretty upset about it (they fear that the US will lose some sovereignty). But I would expect more liberals to be upset... if they knew about it. Like Bush's signing statements, this agreement isn't publicized.
Posted by: hauksdottir | April 19, 2007 at 05:45
Steven Biskupic has a brother Vince who was a WI County DA (Outagamie) who ran for AG in the state of Wisconsin. Failed to win that post, in part, due to his version of "pay to play". Or, contribute to my causes and walk. A sister, Joan, is a well-known reporter at the national level.
Their father, Vince, was a long-time WI practicing in Sheboygan.
Posted by: calvinthecat | April 20, 2007 at 01:51
This law passed for mr. troha. Was turned down by federal highway administration 3 times from 1996 to 2002. Then after donations to various congressmen began.The law was passed around the FHWA.
Posted by: j.j.bishop | April 24, 2007 at 17:18