by emptypockets
The Geico Washington Bridge, one of Manhattan's eight bridges and the only one connecting the island to New Jersey, was conceived as early as 1906 although construction did not begin until 1927. Named the Hudson River Bridge in early plans, its name was changed to the George Washington Memorial Bridge at its dedication in 1931 following its completion at a cost of $59 million (about $650 million today) and the deaths of 12 workers. Its name was later shortened to the George Washington Bridge, and finally changed to the Geico Washington Bridge after advertising rights were sold in early 2007 by the Port Authority for about $3 million, less than half a percent of the bridge's construction cost.
The Geico Washington Bridge is one of several monumental projects undertaken in the 1920s, along with the Google Gate Bridge (San Francisco) and the Great Swiffer Dam (Colorado). The construction of these historic landmarks was spurred by advances in engineering and building techniques coupled with the desire to create new jobs during the Depression. (Depression is a registered trademark of SmithKline Beecham. Ask your doctor about Paxil.)
At the 100th anniversary celebration for the bridge, actors recreated the scene of its dedication, at which then-Governor Franklin D. Roosevelt said:
It should be an inspiration to us to recall that here, at Fort Washington in 1776, our forebears made one of the most valiant stands against insurmountable obstacles of the entire Revolutionary War... Here, in a defense unmatched for heroism, 3,000 Americans sacrificed all for a great cause. We may rejoice that this great bridge marks a site so sacred in patriotic memories.
Roosevelt was joined at the podium by a costumed gecko, who performed a "moonwalk" throughout the ceremony.
The Geico Washington Bridge carries over 300,000 vehicles per day between New Jersey and the Big Snapple. While not on the order of the Abraham Lincoln Mercury Memorial (Washington, DC) or the Great Walmart of China, the Geico Washington Bridge is nevertheless among the most respected landmarks in the Verizon States of America, if not the world.
And if you believe that, I've got a bridge I'd like to sell you.
don't blog drunk. It makes baby jeebus cry.
Posted by: smiley | January 07, 2007 at 00:04
well, it's been a long week, smiley. but perhaps some background is called for.
Geico really did just buy advertising rights to the GW Bridge, including "a huge billboard on top of the toll plaza... Geico signs with the company’s mascot, a gecko, on the tollbooths and electronic signs on the approach roads... and costumed gecko mascots will appear at Port Authority bus stations." The Golden Gate Bridge authority really is looking into similar sponsorship deals.
For over a year now New York has given special sponsorship to Snapple, which has become a financial boondoggle. We've got everything from the American Airlines Theater to the ING marathon. And in the news lately, we learned we'll also be getting our garbage trucks sponsored by Glad, and cabbies are about to be force to foot the bill to install TV sets in all the cabs that will play movie trailers and advertisements during taxi rides.
Sometimes it's hard to tell when you're drunk anymore.
Posted by: emptypockets | January 07, 2007 at 00:21
apparently I'm not the only one who thinks we're selling our national landmarks cheap -- and note that this isn't the first time the Port Authority tried selling off its assets for much much less than they were worth (5-6x too low in this case, at a loss of roughly $15 million). West Side Stadium, anyone?
Posted by: emptypockets | January 07, 2007 at 00:26
Sports stadiums switch sponsors every few years, making it hard to tell what city a game is held in. And my law school alma mater has some donor's name EVERYWHERE but the bathrooms.
It is just part of the cheapening of America. Lady Bird Johnson got Coingress to prohibit most billboards on the Interstates so we could see the flowers, but then they put advertising everywhere else so we couldn't escape it. Personally, I refuse to wear clothing that advertises anything but a couple of local sports teams of which I am a fan.
Posted by: Mimikatz | January 07, 2007 at 14:01
Gee. Now I'm going to have to spend the rest of the evening preparing my list of reasons to get up in the morning.
Posted by: prostratedragon | January 07, 2007 at 22:23
'Case it's not obvious, that's dead serious.
Posted by: prostratedragon | January 07, 2007 at 23:09
I have noticed that in sports stories and in sports broadcasts, the author or broadcaster is almost always careful to give the sponser's name instead of just writing, or saying, for example ``the Fiesta Bowl''. Would they be legally liable in some way if they omitted the sponser's name? Does the sponser acquire something like a trademark? I would have thought that there would be some basic freedom of speech/press argument against any such liability, but perhaps I am just missing something. In any case, I share EP's digust with all this, and appreciate the satire.
Posted by: Paul Lyon | January 08, 2007 at 02:33
I don't know about you all, but I personally feel a little uneasy if I don't see the little ® registered symbol after a proper noun. I want a Name I Can Trust, always.
Great stuff EP.
Posted by: jonnybutter | January 08, 2007 at 20:41
My life's been basically bland recently. I can't be bothered with anything recently. Pretty much nothing seems important. I've basically been doing nothing worth mentioning.
Posted by: got used book store | August 12, 2007 at 06:25
Pretty much nothing seems worth doing. I've just been letting everything happen without me these days. I've just been sitting around waiting for something to happen, but whatever.
Posted by: candy store business plan | August 13, 2007 at 18:13
I feel like a fog, not that it matters. I've pretty much been doing nothing , but eh. Today was a loss. I haven't gotten much done for a while.
Posted by: vinyl tote bag | August 14, 2007 at 16:12
Males should be allowed to go shirtless at home only - Or vary with places for another persuasive speech topic
Posted by: homer simpsons dad | August 21, 2007 at 13:49
We are killing the rainforest
Posted by: ford detroit locker | August 22, 2007 at 13:52
Blame the parents of a murderer parents for the crime
Posted by: archive florida lottery | August 23, 2007 at 16:55
Children in ... fill in the nation of your choice ... are living better
Posted by: casino gambling guide | August 24, 2007 at 20:38
I've just been letting everything wash over me. I've pretty much been doing nothing. I've just been sitting around not getting anything done.
Posted by: 2007 bulldog calendar french wall | August 30, 2007 at 13:09
Life is designed by some sort of intelligence, God created life
Posted by: domain | August 31, 2007 at 13:40
Sex offenders should be, should not be castrated
Posted by: road | September 04, 2007 at 12:17
Help the homeless down the street and persuade them to look for work
Posted by: sleepsins | September 20, 2007 at 19:59