It has been common wisdom for so long--gerrymandering created so many safe GOP seats that they could never lose the House. Yet now they stand on the brink of defeat, and the only question is how big will it be? How did this happen? What happened to all those safe seats?
The Cook Political Report is generally recognized to be objective, not partisan. They post a Competitive House Race Chart every two or three weeks (weekly now), in pdf format, and they are available on their website by going to the linked page and clicking on the desired date. They show the seats held by each party that are considered toss-ups, lean (party) and likely (party), with the remainder considered safe seats. Right after Bush's inauguration they posted their first chart for 2006. It showed the Dems with 183 safe seats, exactly what they have now. In fact, the entire cycle the Dems have never fallen below 180 safe seats, out of a total of 202 they hold. (Sanders is counted with the Dems.) On January 21, 2005 the Dems had 4 tossup seats, 8 lean Dem and 7 likely Dem, a total of 12 competitive and 7 potentially competitive seats. Now they have no Dem seats that are considered toss-ups, 13 lean Dem (of which 4 are GOP-held) and 10 likely Dem, a bit of an improvement.
The Republicans started the cycle with more seats at risk. They had 204 safe seats, with only 2 considered toss-ups (IN-09 and PA-06, presumably because of the close vote in 2004), 16 lean GOP and 11 likely GOP, for a total of 18 competitive and 11 potentially competitive seats. With yesterday's revisions, the GOP now has only 170 safe seats in the Cook Report's opinion. Four seats are lean Dem (AZ-08, CO-07, FL-16 and TX-22), 25 are toss-ups, 16 are lean GOP and 17 are likely GOP. That's 45 competitive GOP-held seats and 17 more that are potentially competitive, three of which were added yesterday, AZ-01, CA-50 and KS-02. I would also add NE-03, which CQ just upgraded, and WA-05.
The GOP seemed initially to be in great shape. By June 17, 2005 the GOP was up to 206 safe seats, and the Dems were down to 180 safe seats, a formidable situation for the Dems. But many of the 18 competitive and 9 potentially competitive GOP-held seats were already open seats, or soon would be, with some Republican representatives retiring and some seeking higher office. It was a gradually accelerating decline from there, as more and more seats that were supposedly safe became less so. One year later, in the June 7, 2006 chart, the GOP was down to 191 safe seats to 181 for the Dems. The Dems had two toss-ups, while the GOP had 9. Ominously, there were now 24 GOP-held seats listed as likely GOP, or potentially competitive. Then . . . .
Over the summer, Democratic challengers fought hard and the news went mostly against the GOP. By September 1, 2006, just when normal people started paying attention, there were 180 Safe Dem seats to only 178 safe GOP seats, the first time the GOP had fallen behind. And with Tom DeLay's defeat in the courts, TX-22 was now "lean Dem." The September 11 blip was just that. Of the 10 GOP seats listed as tossups in the June 17, 2006 report, 2 are now lean Dem, and 8 are still toss-ups, joined by 17 new endangered GOPers. None of the GOP toss-up seats have gone off the critical list; FL-16 (Foley) went from likely GOP straight to the lean Dem list, and NY-26 (Reynolds) went from safe to tossup soon thereafter.
Now, the same seats that were competitive in September, 2005 are still competitive, except Charles Boustany (LA-07), most of them more so. And look at this month's additions to the competitive and potentially competitive GOP seats: ID-01, MN-01, NV-02 and OH-02 are now competitive, and CO-05, NC-08, OH-02, PA-04 have joined the potentially competitive list. The GOP has lost ground everywhere outside the deep South (but including Florida, with 5 listed seats, and 7 seats in KY, NC and VA), not just in the Northeast but in the West and upper midwest as well. If the Dems win just over half of the GOP's lean Dem and toss-up seats, they win the House. With a major push, the Dems should win half of the 45 competitive GOP seats and 2 or 3 of the potentially competitive--even seats not yet on the list that no one is watching.
What heppened to all those safe seats? Iraq and Bush. people are now afraid that Bush' competence on iraq will match his work on Katrina.
Posted by: DemFromCT | October 19, 2006 at 14:25
Thanks MK. I love posts which provide historical perspective and trends. Would you have info from past elections on polls a month out vs actuals? Curious if we can apply probabilities to the polls based on past results and actually come up with tighter numbers for win/loss.
Posted by: ab initio | October 19, 2006 at 14:41
If I understand right, the policy of the Cook Report is never to downgrade an incumbent below "toss-up" -- a policy that seems itself predicated on the assumption of gerrymandered safe seats. That you have taken their analysis and used it to dispel part of the assumption it was based on is particularly compelling.
On another topic, do you see any meaningful relationship between the stock market's recent buoyancy and the increasingly likelihood of at least one Dem takeover, or is it just coincidence?
Posted by: emptypockets | October 19, 2006 at 14:48
Katrina didn't affect the congressional races right away. The GOP didn't really start bleeding until May of 2006. In January of 2006 the GOP still had 191 safe seats to 181 for the Dems.
How did the Dems do it? Iraq, yes, but also better candidates (in some cases much better), better message (remember Dem challengers have been attacking on Iraq, even if the DC Dems have been relatively quiet), lots of money and, yes, Iraq.
I think that a fair number of the GOP toss-ups may survive because they were ready for a tough campaign, while the Dems could take 10-15 seats from the lean and likely GOP columns, where the incumbents weren't.
One correction: it looks like the first time the Dems had more safe seats was June 7, 2006, when the Dems had 181 and the R's had 180.
Posted by: Mimikatz | October 19, 2006 at 14:50
I will guess that with the House and Senate changing hands, and even some moderate Republicans turning into Democrats that the Iraqi war will be abandoned.
The only question will be how to get out without the congress looking like it caused a bigger mess than the President.
The President (Bush) realizing that all he has to win is a better place in history will predict that if the congress brings about a disaster (actually further disaster) it will be on their head, and he will endeavor to be seen as a prophetic Winston Churchill type leader, ousted by a foolish self serving Parliament.
That is all he can do.
Posted by: Jodi | October 19, 2006 at 14:53
Pockets: As you can see from what they did to Reynolds, that policy isn't inviolate.
I think that Wall Street would favor divided government, meaning the Dems taking at least one house. The Dow Jones is at a high, but not if adjusted for inflation, and the S&P 500 and especially the NASDAQ not. At least the NASDAQ if not both are below where they were when Bush took office. The stock market mostly affects the top 5% or so. Most people have stock mutual funds in retirement accounts, so it is kind of imaginary gains.
Historically, the stock market does better under the Dems, I think because they tend to spread prosperity wider and that boosts growth. The GOP concentrates wealth and power, and tolerates some sereious inefficiencies in service of their redistributive agenda.
Posted by: Mimikatz | October 19, 2006 at 14:57
you can fool some of the people all of the time
and you can fool all of the people some of the time
but you can't fool all of the people all of the time
apparently, the "some of the people" that you can fool "all of the time" is about 32%
those who do not remember the past ...
Posted by: freepatriot | October 19, 2006 at 15:02
And for the historical perspective: In its last report on October 29, 2004 Cook had 7 Dem tossups, of whom one lost, I think; 10 lean Dem, of which 1 lost (Baron Hill in IN-09) and 6 likely D, of whom two lost in Texas--Max Sandlin and Nick Lampson. Martin Frost also lost in Texas, and Charlie Stenholm lost in a new seat that was listed as lean R. I think. One R lost, Phil Crane, who was listed as a R toss-up.
But that was a funny election because of the Texas redistricting, and of course there wasn't the 16% congressional approval and dislike of Bush and the GOP then, more's the pity.
Posted by: Mimikatz | October 19, 2006 at 15:07
Or, "Those who don't remember history have to take it in summer school." ---Buffy the Vampire Slayer.
Posted by: Mimikatz | October 19, 2006 at 15:08
history is easy
knowing what the history is designed to hide is the hard part
Posted by: freepatriot | October 19, 2006 at 15:16
Mimikatz, it looks like Reynolds' seat was only downgraded to "toss-up," consistent with the Cook Report's incumbent policy. They did downgrade Foley's seat further but I'd think the incumbency rule went out the window when he resigned even though his name will appear on the ballot.
Posted by: emptypockets | October 19, 2006 at 15:21
OK. You are right. I put NY-26 in the lean Dem category along with PA-10, though. I'll update my list tomorrow.
Posted by: Mimikatz | October 19, 2006 at 15:35
By September 1, 2006, just when normal people started paying attention....
LMAO.
Posted by: John Casper | October 19, 2006 at 15:51
people in Normal gotta pay for attention ???
I knew Kansas was fucked up, but I had no idea it was so bad
Posted by: freepatriot | October 19, 2006 at 16:03
I think the answer to the question of what happened to all the safe seats that gerrymandering was supposed to create is the gerrymandering itself. An example is in order to explain that seemingly confusing statement. Let's take TX-22 as an example. That's Tom DeLay's old seat and I guarantee you that Nick Lampson will have it in January. Texas was gerrymandered to ensure a Republican majority Congressional delegation in the 2004 election. To achieve that end, Tom DeLay gave up a lot of strongly Republican precincts so they could be used to create comfortable Republican majorities in other districts. The goal in Texas (like a lot of other redistricting efforts) was to create as many 55-45 majority districts as possible for your party while cramming your opponent in fewer, but much higher margin districts (65-35 typically). The assumption was that 55-45 was a safe margin (in the face of demographic changes, etc.), at least until another redistricting could be performed. DeLay never considered that he could screw things up so badly that his party would essentially no chance to hold on to a 55-45 majority district with a popular incumbent.
The flaw in this logic is that you create fewer total seats for your opponent, but those seats are inherently "safer" than yours. If your party hits a run of bad news, you will suddenly have a whole bunch of incumbents who have never really faced a difficult challenge in serious trouble. Of course, your opponent needs to be positioned to take advantage of the situation by recruiting and funding real challengers. It's about time people started acknowledging that Howard Dean has the right idea about how to build a party.
Posted by: William Ockham | October 19, 2006 at 16:50
WO: Yes, that is part of it, especially for TX-22. And probably in IN, NY and OH. But gerrymandering doesn't explain CA-04 (R+11), ID-01 (R+19) or KY-02 (R+13) being competitive, or CO-05 (R+16), NE-01 (R+12), OH-02 (R+13), or WY-AL (R+19) being potentially competitive. That is due to poor or unresponsive GOP candidates, scandal and Iraq.
Posted by: Mimikatz | October 19, 2006 at 17:27
Mimikatz,
You are correct. I'm not trying to explain the whole phenomenon, simply pointing out that the scope of the Republicans' problem is exacerbated by their own handiwork. In effect, they "misunderestimated" the safety margin needed to ride out a potential national wave of voter disenchantment. Since I live close to TX-22 and voted for Nick Lampson two years ago, I'm mostly engaging in a bit of oh-so-sweet schadenfreude. If you think the national Republican party is odious, I would invite you to take a close look at the Texas Republican party. On second thought, don't bother. Nobody should have to look at something like that.
Posted by: William Ockham | October 19, 2006 at 17:49
I was wondering today what explains our selection of much better candidates this year. Rahm surely gets some credit (Shuler will waltz to victory, it's looking like). Then there's the issue that for anti-war candidates--even for anti-war veteran candidates--the Democratic party was the only feasible party. Ditto electoral reform. But I also think some of it has to be attributed to open source selection--since DC bagged on widespread recruitment, it left the field open for some more confrontational candidates who could make the most of a R+10 district. And, finally, I think it's a testament to the fact that fed up people who decide to run (accidental candidates, Markos likes to call them) resonate better with voters than a lot of professional politicians.
Posted by: emptywheel | October 19, 2006 at 18:04
Gerrymandering isn't responsible for the seats you list, Mimikatz, but gerrymandering is probably responsible for all of those R seats in New York coming under pressure at the same time. Not one of those incumbents (except Reynolds) did an obvious thing wrong, but I'm guessing they're all rigged to vote in about the same percentages, close to 55-45.
only site I've found with 2004 presidential vote by Congressional District (click on the state first)
Incumbent: Bushvote-Kerryvote
Sue Kelly: 54-45
John Sweeney: 54-46
John McHugh: 51-47
Sherry Boehlert: 53-47
Jim Walsh: 48-50 for Kerry
Tom Reynolds: 55-43
Randy Kuhl: 57-42
Vito Fossella: 55-45
Katherine Harris: 56-44
Mark Foley: 54-46
Clay Shaw: 48-53 for Kerry
Steve Chabot: 50-49
Deborah Pryce: 50-49
Chris Chocola: 56-43
Richard Pombo: 54-45
Robin Hayes: 54-45
Charles Taylor: 57-43
Cathy McMorris: 57-41
I see three classes of seats that we have a chance to grab this year. There's the long-time (usually) Republican incumbents in blue districts. The three CT races, the three Philly races, Clay Shaw, Heather Wilson, Dave Reichert, the Nussle seat, the Beauprez seat... that's about it. These are the districts Charlie Cook and co were looking at 12 months ago.
There's also the lightning strike districts. Two subsets: the scandal districts: Ney, DeLay, Doolittle, Cunningham, Foley, Reynolds, Sherwood, Pombo. And, the lucky primary districts. The results of Republican primaries, and especially Club for Growth activity, are necessary (though not sufficient) conditions for our chances in CO-05, ID-01, NE-03, and to some extent, OH-02. We almost got lucky in NV-02, and even though we already planned to fight there, we got very lucky in AZ-08 also. Most of these weird Western seats that are in play, required Club for Growth primary wins to put them in play. That's not a fun conclusion but it's true. The other western seats that are in play -- Conrad Burns, Barbara Cubin, Marilyn Musgrave -- depended on complete dolts winning Republican primaries long ago. We've done great things to take advantage of the situation, but we didn't get there on our own.
The third class of seats is the one that I was originally trying to post about. That's the big group of R incumbents in "safely drawn" 55-45 seats. Unlike the first group, these guys didn't see their challengers coming and didn't campaign up 12 or 18 months ago. The Chocola story writ large. These are the seats it would be fun to sweep away; although, they'll be harder to hold than the first group of seats. Still, the "wave" everyone talks about consists of the fact that 55-45 gerrymanders aren't safe in this climate, and if even a good portion of those 55-45 incumbents lose, Congress will be a VERY different place in 2007. These seats were designed to stay Republican, but the map-drawers did not plan for an environment as deeply hostile as this one. They cut their maps too close and could lose a whole lot of seats as a result.
So if you try to figure out a narrative, you have 1) the old "moderate" Republicans in blue districts finally getting chucked out, plus 2) Republican hubris, in various forms, coming to bite them. That hubris ties together the scandal seats, the ClubforGrowth seats, and the too-confidently-gerrymandered seats.
And of course, the reason their hubris is misplaced, the reason their aggressive posture is failing them, is that they don't have the subtance necessary to govern well and keep the illusion going. They campaign like wolverines -- again, tying together the K Street corruption, the aggressive gerrymanders, and the aggressive use of primaries -- but they govern so very badly that the scales fall off people's eyes and they see only corrupt, power-hungry incompetents. Or rather, they see Iraq and Katrina, and the completely unserious responses to both, and decide they've seen enough.
Hm, last paragraph needs work, but I gotta run.
Posted by: texas dem | October 19, 2006 at 18:46
emptywheel, I was wondering about that also and wondering how much of it is just that there are MORE democrats lately, and so we're drawing from a bigger pool -- and when you do that you usually end up with more talented people.
Posted by: emptypockets | October 19, 2006 at 18:51
It's everything. I agree about the 55-45 seats this time around. That's why I mentioned IN, NY and PA as places where redistricting would work in our favor this time.
I have several times cited Jonathan Krasno's piece the Redistricting Myth. Much of what is attributed to redistricting and/or the power of incumbency is a self-fulfilling prophecy in that incumbents often don't get strong challenges. This is exacerbating by targetting, where most money flows to a few seats. Good challengers are reluctant to challenge where they don't think they will get support.
This time the Dems did do an active recruitment job in re-fielding strong challengers such as Lois Murphy, Diane Farrell, Baron Hill and Ken Lucas and recruiting good candidates like Patsy Madrid in NM-01, Linda Stender in NJ-07 and Mary Jo Kilroy in OH-15 who had proved they could win elections. They were also pushed by the netroots' and pros like Ruy Teixeira's agitation for spreading the field. And the weaker the GOP looked, the more good challengers came in of their own accord. That is really true of the Western candidates. Look at the guys in NE-03 and WA-05--rancher-scholars with PhDs and new ideas to revitalize agriculture as well as opposition to the Iraq War. And, of course, there are the crazy Clubbies like Sali in ID-01 and Lamborn in CO-05. And there is enough money and enthusiasm that the Dems can put resources into lots of races. So it looks good for lots of reasons.
Posted by: Mimikatz | October 19, 2006 at 19:27
This could be the perfect storm for many of the reasons stated on this thread. All the polls are close and I am biting finger nails as I feel the races are a lot closer and the margins of victory will be quite small - so it could go either way. We still live in a polarized country and when it gets time to pull the lever Repubs will vote their party. The question is will more Dems turn out in 3 weeks and vote their party? How reliable are the voter intensity numbers in the polls? The grounds for optimism are that the Dems have credible challengers in many more races against incumbents and so the law of probability means some of those races will turn blue.
What are the most reliable indicators in the last weeks of an election?
Posted by: ab initio | October 19, 2006 at 20:14
Texas Dem
interesing post
Posted by: jwp | October 19, 2006 at 23:01
Speaking of Reynolds, apparently SurveyUSA now has him back in the lead.
Feels like we're in the bottom of the 9th, up by 2, 2 out, but they've got the bases loaded. Historically speaking, of course, that still ends well for us.
Posted by: emptypockets | October 20, 2006 at 08:16
milf-cruiser
1000orgasms
1000 orgasms
2chicks1dick
2 chicks 1 dick
adultrealitypass
adult reality pass
bigsausagepizza
big sausage pizza
bigtitbangers
big tit bangers
bikinibanger
bikini banger
blackbroswhitehoes
black bros white hoes
borderbangers
border bangers
cheerleaderauditions
cheerleader auditions
collegefuckfest
college fuck fest
eatmyblackmeat
eat my black meat
eurobridetryouts
euro bride tryouts
eurofucktrip
euro fuck trip
girlshuntinggirls
girls hunting girls
hardcorepartying
hardcore partying
latinacaliente
latina caliente
limopatrol
limo patrol
littleapril
little april
megapornaccess
mega porn access
milfcruiser
milf cruiser
milkmycock
milk my cock
mommylovescock
mommy loves cock
nakedcollegecoeds
naked college coeds
nudebeachhouse
nude beach house
realrookies
real rookies
rectalrooter
rectal rooter
rightofftheboat
right off the boat
slutseeker
slut seeker
stripclubexposed
strip club exposed
teenbrazil
teen brazil
teenhitchhikers
teen hitchhikers
yankmycrank
yank my crank
http://seventeen-live.net
seventeen-live
adultmoviezone
adult movie zone
allbigcocks
all big cocks
asianangels
asian angels
asiaporno
asia porno
bigandslutty
big and slutty
clubseventeen
club seventeen
clubseven teen
club seven teen
cumsplatter
cum splatter
dirtydykes
dirty dykes
dirtyteen
dirty teen
dudedorm
dude dorm
dudesonline
dudes online
excusemeclub
excuseme club
excuse me club
fuckspy
fuck spy
girlsfrombrasil
girls from brasil
grannyfucking
granny fucking
interracialfuck
interracial fuck
interracialfuckorgy
interracial fuck orgy
interracialorgy
interracial orgy
irorgy
ir orgy
jimslip
jim slip
lolitasex
lolita sex
lolitateen
lolita teen
meninthenude
men in the nude
mrskin
mr skin
mysexykittens
my sexy kittens
nitrocelebs
nitro celebs
oldfartsyoungtarts
old farts young tarts
oldtarts
old tarts
redlightdistrict
red light district
retroraw
retro raw
rodox
seventeenlive
seven teenlive
seventeen live
seven teen live
seventeenvideo
seven teenvideo
seventeen video
seven teen video
sexspy
sex spy
sinfultales
sinful tales
spycams
spy cams
teenmoviezone
teen movie zone
teensex
teen sex
teensfromtokyo
teens from tokyo
teenshomealone
teens home alone
teenteenteen
teen teen teen
titvision
tit vision
topcams
top cams
ukroadtrips
uk roadtrips
uk road trips
upskirts
up skirts
wasteland
waste land
wetscape
wet scape
wivesexposed
wives exposed
insanecockbrothas
adultcams
adult cams
allgangbang
all gang bang
allrealityxxxpass
allreality xxxpass
all reality xxx pass
allstarstuds
all star studs
amateurpie
amateur pie
analvalley
anal valley
asianparade
asian parade
back seat banger
backseatbangers
back seat bangers
bangboat
bang boat
bestmovies
best movies
bigcocksex
big cock sex
blackcockswhitesluts
black cocks white sluts
boobexamscam
boob exam scam
bubblebuttsgalore
bubblebutts galore
bubble butts galore
cartoon69
cartoon 69
cheerchix
cheer chix
collegewildparties
college wild parties
couplesseduceteens
couples seduce teens
cyberfoldsweb
cyber folds web
discountrealitysites
discount reality sites
dopornstars
do porn stars
ebonyjoy
ebony joy
euroteensxxx
euro teens xxx
facialmag
facial mag
fantasylatina
fantasy latina
fetishhell
fetish hell
firsttimeswallows
first time swallows
gangbangsquad
gang bang squad
gangboat
girlsgetcrazy
girlsget crazy
girls get crazy
hardporn
hard porn
herfirstanalsex
her first anal sex
herfirstasstomouth
her first ass to mouth
herfirstbigcock
her first big cock
herfirstdp
her first dp
herfirstlesbiansex
her first lesbian sex
hirsutebeavers
hirsute beavers
hisfirsthugecock
his first huge cock
hotcampusteens
hot campus teens
housewifebangers
house wife bangers
hugeboobsgalore
hugeboobs galore
huge boobs galore
hugerealboobs
huge real boobs
indiachix
india chix
insanecockbrothas
insane cock brothas
interracialjoy
interracial joy
iteens
i teens
justfacials
just facials
largegirlsxxx
large girls xxx
lesboerotica
lesbo erotica
maturexrotica
mature xrotica
milfseeker
milf seeker
movieaccess
movie access
mysextour
my sex tour
orgysexparties
orgy sex parties
pornoground
porno ground
pornstudsearch
porn stud search
seeasians
see asians
shegotpimped
she got pimped
sporterotica
sport erotica
squirthunter
squirt hunter
successwithgirls
success with girls
teensforcash
teens for cash
tittymax
titty max
ultravideos
ultra videos
virginteenlesbians
virgin teen lesbians
voyeurgals
voyeur gals
wildfucktoys
wild fuck toys
xxxsupersize
xxx supersize
realsquirt
18teenlive
18 teen live
adultmovienetwork
adult movie network
adultvideonetwork
adult video network
adultxxxpornstars
adult xxx pornstars
analcravings
anal cravings
asiancream
asian cream
bushhunter
bush hunter
cashstrappedteens
cash strapped teens
cocksusa
cock susa
collegefucktour
college fuck tour
cumswallowinglessons
cum swallowing lessons
cumswappingbitches
cum swapping bitches
curioushunks
curious hunks
ebonygirlsonline
ebony girls online
facialbuffet
facial buffet
fetishview
fetish view
freakishcocks
freakish cocks
gangbanglessons
gang bang lessons
hardcoremoviestation
hardcore movie station
hentaixxxsex
hentai xxx sex
hotspermfacials
hot sperm facials
interracialtv
interracial tv
iwantamateurs
iwant amateurs
lesbianlessons
lesbian lessons
lesborama
lesbo rama
maturehotel
mature hotel
milfrider
milf rider
milfriders
milf riders
militaryfantasy
military fantasy
momsneedcash
moms need cash
monstercockclub
monster cock club
monstercockfarm
monster cock farm
movieerotica
movie erotica
orgyfantasy
orgy fantasy
petitebeaver
petite beaver
pureteenporn
pure teen porn
realandnatural
real and natural
shavednwet
shavedn wet
shemaleseduction
simplyamateur
simply amateur
sluttoons
slut toons
studtoons
stud toons
teenagetwinks
teendirtbags
teen dirt bags
teenslutsgonewild
teen sluts gonewild
teenthrills
teen thrills
twinkcocks
twink cocks
ultrastud
ultra stud
uncensoredextreme
uncensored extreme
whitepussyblackcocks
whitepussy black cocks
wildlatinagirls
wildlatina girls
real squirt
allaboutashley
all about ashley
amazinganal
amazing anal
amazinggangbangs
amazing gang bangs
analpals
anal pals
analsweeties
anal sweeties
asiantease
asian tease
averageho
average ho
beachteens
beach teens
bimbowives
bimbo wives
blacksweeties
black sweeties
blondepubes
blonde pubes
boobieclub
boobie club
brownhairgirls
brown hair girls
bushless
bush less
celebhotel
celeb hotel
cigarettesluts
cigarette sluts
circuspenis
circus penis
clubheshe
club heshe
club he she
clubtitties
club titties
creamyfacials
creamy facials
cumcheeks
cum cheeks
digitalchicks
digital chicks
dildodippers
dildo dippers
dirtyxxxsex
dirty xxx sex
dreamkelly
dream kelly
ebonycheeks
ebony cheeks
facialmasters
facial masters
farmsecrets
farm secrets
farmsexy
farm sexy
filthyletters
filthy letters
fistbang
fist bang
footcravings
foot cravings
freshauditions
fresh auditions
freshfacials
fresh facials
freshteens
fresh teens
fuckingtoons
fucking toons
gir for girl
girlforgirl
girlranch
girl ranch
grandegirls
grande girls
hardcoretoons
hardcore toons
hothaley
hot haley
hotnudegranny
hot nude granny
indiauncovered
india uncovered
interracialsexfest
interracial sex fest
jennyheart
jenny heart
junglegirls
jungle girls
kinkymaturesluts
kinky mature sluts
kuntfu
kunt fu
latinasex
latina sex
latinatime
latina time
latinsfinest
latins finest
lipsticklesbo
lipstick lesbo
manhunter
man hunter
miniboobs
mini boobs
missionupskirt
mission upskirt
naughtyamateur
naughty amateur
naughtytherapy
naughty therapy
nevershot
never shot
oralfantasies
oral fantasies
perfectorgy
perfect orgy
pimp4aday
pimp 4 a day
pompomporno
pom pom porno
pornwannabe
porn wannabe
pregnantbang
pregnant bang
redhairsex
red hair sex
sarasexton
sara sexton
secretfetishes
secret fetishes
sexyhardcore
sexy hardcore
sheshuge
shes huge
shockingcocks
shocking cocks
slamthatass
slam that ass
slutmovies
slut movies
soapboys
solosydney
solo sydney
streetstrippers
street strippers
suckmebitch
suck me bitch
sugarmamas
sugar mamas
superbush
super bush
sweetcherrys
sweet cherrys
tabooinsertions
taboo insertions
teenbody
teen body
teenfactory
teen factory
upskirtschool
upskirt school
videoseekers
video seekers
voyeurteens
voyeur teens
wantwendy
want wendy
xxxtryouts
xxx tryouts
karas xxx
absolutelymale
absolutely male
adult movie zone
all big cocks
allteens
all teens
asian angels
asiannudes
asian nudes
asianpleasures
asian pleasures
asia porno
assbreakers
ass breakers
big and slutty
brunob
bruno b
chicabonbon
chica bon bon
classicmature
classic mature
cum splatter
dirty dykes
dirty teen
dude dorm
dudes online
ebonycafe
ebony cafe
ebonyfantasy
ebony fantasy
fuck spy
gogovideo
go go video
grandmaisaslut
grand maisa slut
granny fucking
heavyknockers
heavy knockers
interracial fuck
interracial fuck orgy
interracial orgy
ir orgy
jizzcatcher
jizz catcher
kara
karaadultplayground
kara adult playground
karasadult
karasadultplayground
karas adult playground
karasamateurs
karas amateurs
karasplayground
karasxxx
karas xxx
karaxxx
kara xxx
kinkylesbo
kinky lesbo
lickalicka
licka licka
lolita teen
malenextdoor
male next door
men in the nude
mr skin
newandinnocent
new and innocent
old tarts
orgyfrenzy
orgy frenzy
playersxxx
players xxx
pornbuster
porn buster
racialbang
racial bang
realhardcore
real hardcore
sex spy
sinful tales
spy cams
sweetblack
sweet black
sweetyoungboys
sweety oung boys
teen movie zone
teensteam
teen steam
tit vision
ultimatestud
ultimate stud
virginsparty
virgins party
webmature
web mature
webyoung
web young
wet scape
whipsandwomen
whips and women
wives exposed
xtremevoyeur
xtreme voyeur
youngamateurs
young amateurs
younglatina
young latina
mrskin
adultmoviezone
allbigcocks
amateur1stfuckflicks
amateur 1st fuck flicks
amazingbrunettes
amazing brunettes
americanhardcore
american hardcore
analranch
anal ranch
asianangels
asianvideowhores
asian video whores
asianxarchive
asian x archive
asiaporno
assfuckflicks
ass fuck flicks
bigandslutty
bigawesometits
big awesome tits
blondebombshells
blonde bombshells
blowjobuniversity
blow job university
chunkyparty
chunky party
cockswallowingvixens
cock swallowing vixens
cumshottheatre
cumshot theatre
cumsplatter
cumtomama
cum to mama
darkandsweet
dark and sweet
dirtydykes
dirtyteen
dudedorm
dudesonline
ebonyhoarchive
ebony ho archive
feetfantasy
feet fantasy
fuckspy
gangland
gang land
grannyfucking
hardxxxfuckvids
hard xxx fuck vids
hornyfirsttimers
horny first timers
hotpornstarcentral
hot pornstar central
interracialfuck
interracialfuckorgy
interracialorgy
interracialxxxmovies
interracial xxx movies
irorgy
jizzedsluts
jizzed sluts
latinamoviefiesta
latina movie fiesta
littlewetpanties
little wet panties
lolitateen
massivecockmadness
massive cock madness
megacockslingers
mega cock slingers
meninthenude
milfmoviemadness
milf movie madness
monstercockhouse
monster cock house
mrskin
oldtarts
overstuffedsluts
overstuffed sluts
petiteangels
petite angels
pornvideo
porn video
premierpornstarflicks
premier pornstar flicks
sexspy
sextoycinema
sex toy cinema
sinfultales
spycams
teencreampies
teen cream pies
teenmoviezone
teensbehavingbadly
teens behaving badly
teentryouts
teen tryouts
titvision
ultimatehardcoreflicks
ultimate hardcore flicks
wetscape
wivesexposed
Posted by: joe | June 23, 2007 at 18:28
Sex is one of the most important aspects of a marital life or any other such like relationship. Sex can make and break a relationship. Hence it is absolutely necessary to pay special attention to the sexual health of both men and women.
Posted by: cialis | September 04, 2007 at 06:43
If you are suffering from erectile dysfunction, you can opt for Viagra and successfully deal with your disorder but while administering Viagra to your system, you should take only the normal Viagra dosage prescribed by the physician and refrain from administering viagra overdose. For a first hand account of all the significant details related to Viagra administration, erectile dysfunction et al, you should visit the website http://www.viagracare.com and explore the links placed in the site, mainly viagra articles, viagra news and Viagra Overdose. Another section of the site titled viagra experiences acquaints you with the person experiences of erectile dysfunction patients and how they have rescued themselves from the grip of impotency with Viagra. Moreover, the section viagra FAQs in the site is a reservoir of significant details concerning Viagra and helps you to deal with your impotency successfully with the anti-impotency drug.
Posted by: viagra | September 05, 2007 at 00:28
If you are a victim of the addiction of smoking and are willing to quit, you must have heard of the quit smoking pill Chantix. The studies showing the excellent results of chantix are performed by its manufacturers Pfizer. In addition many of the people included in the studies couldn’t give up smoking themselves. This definitely doesn’t mean Chantix is inefficient. But Chantix is not a magic bullet to quit smoking. The motivation should come from the smoker.
Posted by: chantix | September 11, 2007 at 00:58
The disease called erectile dysfunction has strengthened its roots among the human breed mainly because of the reason that people are not very willing to share it willingly. These people can get all the information in the ED info sites. Through this information you can do away with their ED.
Posted by: Viagra info site | October 16, 2007 at 02:18
Viagra is a term that is probably no longer new to anybody. It has come
to be recognized with the who’s who of the male sexual disease called
erectile dysfunction. Everybody is aware of the fact that Viagra has
something to do with the male sex organ. These tit bit informations are
alright for the layman, but for those who are prescribed the drug, it is
very important that they have complete knowledge about it, for this
they can refer any href="http://www.besthealthmed.com/viagra_guide.html">viagra guide
available on the net.
Posted by: Viagra guide | October 23, 2007 at 05:37