by Kagro X
Seventy-something days out from the election, and just in time for the post-Labor Day campaign busy season, the White House is rolling out a slate of five more judicial nominations for the appellate courts. With the elections so close and with Republicans, by most accounts, on the ropes, I'm sure Bush and company will be soft-pedaling the whole affair, steering clear of controversial nominations designed to provoke a fight they can ill-afford.
In a move to satisfy the GOP's most conservative supporters, President Bush on Wednesday nominated five people as appeals court judges, including one whom Democrats have threatened to block with a filibuster.
Goodness, but those boys at 1600 are bold! And timely, too!
News that Bush had decided to nominate the five conservative jurists came just before Bush spoke at a fundraiser for Bob Corker, who faces a tough Senate race against Democratic nominee Harold Ford Jr.
And they've clearly been cowed by the judicial pistol-whipping they've gotten from the judges who have warned them to stop legislating (or erasing legislation) from the White House.
"I need a U.S. senator who understands that we need people on the bench who will strictly interpret the Constitution and not use the bench to legislate," Bush said.
So, who's up this time?
A White House statement said Bush was nominating Terrence Boyle of North Carolina and William James Haynes II of Virginia to the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Va.; Michael Brunson Wallace of Mississippi to the 5th Circuit in New Orleans; and William Gerry Myers III and Norman Randy Smith, both of Idaho, for the 9th Circuit in San Francisco.
Recognize anybody? How about Boyle, Haynes and Myers?
Boyle, of course, has had his nomination stalled since forever. Haynes is a torture memo author, and Myers was actually named in the "Gang of 14" deal as one of two judges (the other being Henry Saad) for which the signatories made no commitment for cloture.
Just to refresh some memories, here's a NY Times editorial from the "Way Back Machine," dated March 11, 2005, entitled, "They're Back, and Still Unworthy."
William Myers III, one of the seven filibustered nominees, has built a career as an anti-environmental extremist. He was a longtime lobbyist for the mining and cattle industries. Then, as the Interior Department's top lawyer, he put those industries' interests ahead of the public interest. In one controversial legal opinion, he overturned a decision that would have protected American Indian sacred sites, clearing the way for a company to do extensive mining in the area. Mr. Myers has been nominated to a seat on the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, based in San Francisco. That court plays a major role in determining the environmental law that applies to the Western states.
Terrence Boyle, who has been nominated to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, based in Richmond, is also a troubling choice. He has an extraordinarily high reversal rate for a district court judge. Many of the decisions that have been criticized by higher courts wrongly rejected claims involving civil rights, sex discrimination and disability rights. Mr. Boyle's record is particularly troubling because the court reversing him, the Fourth Circuit, is perhaps the most hostile to civil rights in the federal appellate system, and even it has regularly found his rulings objectionable.
That Times editorial addressed the nominations of three judges. About the third, Thomas Griffith, the Times had this to say:
Thomas Griffith, who has been nominated to the powerful Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, has the unfortunate distinction of having practiced law in two jurisdictions without the required licenses. While practicing law in Washington, D.C., he failed to renew his license for three years. Mr. Griffith blamed his law firm's staff for that omission, but the responsibility was his. When he later practiced law in Utah as general counsel at Brigham Young University, he never bothered to get a Utah license.
Judge Thomas Griffith has had a seat on the bench of the DC Circuit since June of 2005, three months after the Times noted he had no law license. Dry powder and all that.
Haynes is a protégé of Cheney’s influential chief of staff, David Addington. Addington’s relationship with Cheney goes back to the Reagan years, when Cheney, who was then a representative from Wyoming, was the ranking Republican on a House select committee investigating the Iran-Contra scandal. Addington, a congressional aide, helped to write a report for the committee’s Republican minority, arguing that the law banning covert aid to the Contras—the heart of the scandal—was an unconstitutional infringement of Presidential prerogatives. Both men continue to embrace an extraordinarily expansive view of executive power. In 1989, when Cheney was named Secretary of Defense by George H. W. Bush, he hired Addington as a special assistant, and eventually appointed him to be his general counsel. Addington, in turn, hired Haynes as his special assistant and soon promoted him to general counsel of the Army.
So here we are again, staring with disbelief at nominations long believed dead. Our powder dry, elections looming, and Republicans rewarding "reasonable" Democrats who avoided confrontation earlier in the session with mailings like the one below, which I showed you about a year ago.
Gee. Do you think they'll us off the hook if we play ball this time?
Still, in your heart of hearts, you never really believed that playing nice would keep elected Democrats safe from attack, right? And in all likelihood, neither did the elected Democrats, though they might not have known what else to say at the time.
Straight up attacks, loathesome though they be, had to be expected. What's new here is the opportunity for sneak attacks.
Which makes this an opportune time to reexamine two particular provisions of the Gang of 14 deal, I think.
The first is Part I (entitled, "Commitments on Pending Judicial Nominations"), section B:
Status of Other Nominees. Signatories make no commitment to vote for or against cloture on the following judicial nominees: William Myers (9th Circuit) and Henry Saad (6th Circuit).
We're now forced to ask what it means that the White House apparently considers these to be "new nominations. From a release dated August 30, 2006:
President George W. Bush today announced his intention to nominate the following five individuals:
Terrence W. Boyle, of North Carolina, to be United States Circuit Judge for the Fourth Circuit
William James Haynes II, of Virginia, to be United States Circuit Judge for the Fourth Circuit
William Gerry Myers III, of Idaho, to be United States Circuit Judge for the Ninth Circuit
OK, so there's "no commitment" with regard to Myers, right? And that was generally taken to mean his nomination was dead, because the terms of the deal did not commit any of the signatories one way or the other to cloture. Meaning that the votes of signatory Democrats against cloture could not be used against them, or as grounds for signatory Republicans to vote for the nuclear option. That is to say that the now-infamous "extraordinary circumstances" language doesn't enter into the calculation, because that language isn't introduced until Part II of the deal.
But what's the title of Part II? "Commitments for Future Nominations."
See where this is going? Is Myers covered by Part I of the deal, which specifically names him and deals with "pending" nominations? Or does his purported "renomination" on August 30th make him a "future nomination," covered by Part II and the "extraordinary circumstances" test?
And what about the "renominations" of Haynes and Boyle? Are they "pending" nominees or "future" nominees? True, their names don't appear in Part I, section B as Myers' does, but all that means is that there was no deal reached on cloture commitments with regard to their nominations. Unless, of course, you believe (as some Republicans claim to) that a nomination is only "pending" if it's reported out of committee, and that nominations made but bottled up there exist in some sort of limbo that's neither "pending," nor... uh... some other thing, yet to be defined.
The second part of the deal that deserves a second look is in Part II, section B:
In light of the spirit and continuing commitments made in this agreement, we commit to oppose the rules changes in the 109th Congress, which we understand to be any amendment to or interpretation of the Rules of the Senate that would force a vote on a judicial nomination by means other than unanimous consent or Rule XXII.
The commitment, you'll recall, is to oppose the nuclear option in the 109th Congress. And we're about at the end of that. Which means we're just about at the end of the effective life of the deal, anyway. How bad do you think some of the signatories -- particularly those whose commitment to it was questionable from the beginning -- would feel about blowing it up just a few weeks before it was set to expire on its own?
And here's a new twist to think over: the efficacy of the deal was based on having just enough Senators from each party to make it work. Seven Democrats and Seven Republicans, each committed to denying their own party leaders the votes it would take to accomplish either the nuclear option or a successful filibuster, give or take one vote as a margin of error.
Can anybody think of a signatory whose value as a party-anchored counterweight might be in open question today? Let's say, someone who had lost their party's nomination for reelection, and who has opted to jump ship and run as an independent?
What would it mean to Lieberman to have the Republicans threaten the nuclear option in the closing days of the 109th Congress? What would it mean to Republicans to make that threat, knowing that the deal expires soon, anyway? Is the threat for real? Does it give Lieberman the chance to prove his "Democratic" bona fides and play the hero going into the stretch? Does it tempt Lieberman to side with Republicans in classifying these retreads as "future" nominations, failing to find "extraordinary circumstances," and letting them through, telling Connecticut's Dems only that they "should have thought of that before" bouncing him in the primary?
I don't know if anyone can tell where Lieberman's head is right now. But his reaction to these nominations might provide us with some clues, though they'll have to be parsed, picked over, and viewed through the "what is Karl Rove trying to make us think" prism -- not that anyone needs my encouragement to do that.
Par for the course, though, isn't it? Using the ambiguities in the deal to try to redefine its parameters? Just like, oh, well... everything. Torture. The scope of the "state secrets" privilege. The executive role in statutory interpretation. Traditional judicial deference to internal Department of Justice decision-making on redistricting. You name it.
And there couldn't be a more perfect time to test the durability of the nuclear option deal, could there?
"Oh, that only applies to 'pending' nominees," the Republicans will say.
Will Joe add, "Oh, that only applied to me when I was a Democrat"?
Disingenuous as usual. It was "activist judges" who ignored the Constitution and installed Bush in the White House in 2000. (With disputed elections it is Congress, not the Supreme Court, that makes the decision by vote.)
Posted by: Warren | August 31, 2006 at 14:55
"Activist judge" means "a judge who doesn't agree with my [all-important] views".
If he's serious about getting originalist judges, he'll need to start raising the dead, because they're the only ones who can say what the folks at the Constituional Convention in 1787 really meant. Everyone else is interpreting it, including the GOP's favorite 'originalists'.
Posted by: P J Evans | August 31, 2006 at 15:24
"...and not use the bench to legislate," Bush said.
The COUNTRY needs a President who understands that he's not a King and will quit trying to pretend that someone in the Constitution the President is given the right to legislate. Or ajudicate.
BTW - here's a link that has some Cheney, Addington, Haynes info -
http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2006/08/27/military_lawyers_see_limits_on_trial_input/
From the New Yorker/Mora piece, my *favorite* part is probably the discussions of the Beaver memorandum, which said that things being asked about/done were violations of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. But that was ok - someone could just get their superior to authorize them to ... violate the Uniform Code of Military Justice. That's what it takes to get a promotion from Haynes apparently - dazzling thought process like that.
The Gambino Family is going with that theory at their next trial, "Guido said I could"
Posted by: Mary | August 31, 2006 at 15:58
Wasn't Chafee a signatory as well? He seems to be in not quite the same boat as Lieberman, since if he loses (see poll showing him way behind) he won't run as an indie. So he could vote for cloture to thank the right wing who cost him his job.
Frankly I doubt that these actually come up for a vote before the election. It is red meat, the base will be told the Dems are blocking them, but seriously, how many days are there left in the session and don't they have a few other things to do?
Posted by: Mimikatz | August 31, 2006 at 17:30
It's definitely hard to imagine a real vote happening, but with political manipulation being an overt part of governance these days, who knows what can go down in just a few weeks?
Chafee is indeed a signatory. As is Mike DeWine.
Posted by: Kagro X | August 31, 2006 at 17:35
Specter has scheduled a hearing on nominees for Sep6, notice went up today.
http://judiciary.senate.gov/hearing.cfm?id=2047
Posted by: Mary | August 31, 2006 at 22:11
KX, I see the Haynes nomination partly as a way to silence the leading military attorneys who in an armed services committee hearing conducted post-Hamdan opposed the Yoo-ization of military law; as you highlighted in your comment, Haynes has abetted coercive evidence gathering efforts in his professional capacity; Marty Lederman had an interesting article about the right to torture on one of his blogsites last month wherein he goes into a high dudgeon over the amalgam of pious politicians with immoral policymakers in this area of the law. I am glad you are following these matters.
Charlie Savage writing in the Boston Globe this week describes Haynes' efforts to revise military law.
Feinstein and another concerned Democratic Party senator wrote a letter June 2006 describing committee hearings rigging by Republicans so as to prevent testimony about the process of designing detainee hearings; this linked letter was written three weeks before the supreme court declared the detainee hearings configuration illegal on several grounds; Kennedy's formal statement is there.
Sen. Leahy writes a summary of the Judiciary committee democrats assessment of Haynes July 2006.
Sen. Hatch harangues about establishment clause and extolls Griffith credentials, in The Hill June 2004.
Marcia Greenberger, Co-President of the National Women’s Law Center issued a succinct paragraph about why NWLC opposes Boyle. His work habit is so eccentric his opinions as a jurist are kept from the public domain; maybe a senator has sent a FOIA request to view these papers; but who reviews such requests, timely: ?Gonzales personally? There is more about judge Boyle in the appeals reference websites, which I will visit, time allowing*.
__________
*Update: The Alliance for Justice has done work on Griffith and Boyle here. I have read their scathing and revealing report on Boyle, but time demands have me elsewhere.
Coordinate issues involve nomination/renomination timing, the turf redefinitions among the branches, and careerlong planning, as you have observed. Frist likely would serve as Addington Cheney's stalking horse with Lieberman mysteriously bargaining for both sides of the nomination arguments, and eliciting from his (former) caucus timeo danaos et donas ferentes.
Posted by: JohnLopresti | September 01, 2006 at 15:15
Fairly often, especially now when campaign work presses me for time, I wonder if it's really worth it to read through comment sections. John Lopresti, you're the kind of commenter who makes it all worthwhile; thanks very much for your links, which have saved me a ton of searching.
Posted by: Nell | September 03, 2006 at 12:57
ass parade |
ass parade porn |
assparade dee sophie |
big ass parade |
assparade cherokee |
ass olivia olovely parade |
assparade latina |
xxx ass parade |
assparade adrianna |
ass parade sophia |
Bang Bros |
Bang Bros Free |
Bang Bros Ass Parade |
Bangbros Assparade |
Free Bangbros |
Bangbros Website |
Bangbros Gallery |
Girls Bangbros |
Bangbros Pictures |
Bangbros Tugjobs |
bang bros |
bang gang porn |
bang gang hardcore |
bang finger |
bang cum gang |
bang cum gang |
bang gang group sex |
anal bang gang |
bang golf |
ass bang |
big naturals bignaturals |
big natural jug |
big natural asian tit |
big natural latina |
big natural video |
couples seduce teen |
couples seduce teen |
couplesseduceteen |
coupleseduceteen |
couple jeanie seduce teen |
charlotte couple seduce teen |
married couple seduce teen |
couple movie porn seduce teen |
couple seduce teen victoria |
couple lystra seduce teen |
extreme asses |
free extreme ass pic |
extreme ass fucking |
extreme ass |
ass athena extreme |
agazha ass extreme |
extreme big ass |
extreme ass fucking |
ass extreme fucfing |
ass extreme holly |
girls hunting girls |
girl hunting boy |
girl hunting girl movie |
girlshuntinggirls |
fun girl girl hot hunting lesbian |
hunting girl photo |
blog com girlshuntinggirls |
clip free girl girl hunting lesbian |
girl hunting other girl |
girl hunting boy |
i spy camel toe |
ispycameltoe |
i spy camel toe trailer |
camel i intro spy toe |
ispycameltoe riley shy |
i spy camel toe preview |
ispycameltoe jenny vanessa |
ispycameltoe ispycameltoe |
com ispycameltoe sweet |
nikki i spy camel toe |
mega cock cravers |
megacockcravers black |
cock cravers cum mega |
megacockcravers free |
megacockcravers porn |
mega cock cravers pic |
cock cravers cum mega |
megacockcravers movie |
megacockcravers porn |
mega cock cravers pic |
mike in brazil |
mike in brazil |
mike from brazil |
mike in brazil trailer |
mike in brazil com |
luanna mike in brazil |
mike in brazil porn |
brazil in mike sara |
mike does brazil |
brazil in july mike |
milfcruiser milf cruiser |
milfcruiser natalie |
michelle milfcruiser |
milfcruiser nessa |
amberlyn milfcruiser |
milfcruiser sasha |
milfcruiser penny |
emiliana milfcruiser |
gabrielle milfcruiser |
milfcruiser kelly |
milfhunter |
milfhunter movie |
foto gratis milfhunter |
milfhunter gallery |
milfhunter kelly |
milfhunter sex |
milfhunter payton |
girl milfhunter more |
milfhunter jasmine |
milfhunter ndfreehost |
milfhunter |
asian milfhunter |
milfhunter sex |
lita milfhunter |
1 full milfhunter minute |
kate milfhunter |
diana milfhunter |
gianna milfhunter |
april milfhunter |
milfhunter rene |
my first sex teacher |
myfirstsexteacher |
my first sex teacher |
my first sex teacher mrs hayes |
amber first lynn sex teacher |
carla first mrs sex teacher |
my first sex teacher mrs michaels |
amber lynn myfirstsexteacher |
my first sex teacher mrs lee |
myfirstsexteacher carmen hayes |
my friends hot mom |
myfriendshotmom |
my friends hot mom |
blog myfriendshotmom |
friends hot mom torrent |
my friends hot mom movie |
mrs myfriendshotmom steele |
friend hot mom mrs starr |
friend hot mom mrs power |
blonde friend hot mom |
my sisters hot friend |
mysistershotfriend |
my sisters hot friend |
mysisterhotfriend |
my sister hot friend |
mysistershotfriends |
my sisters hot friends |
brianna friend hot love sister |
dani friend hot sister |
friend hot karina kay sister |
round and brown |
brown lori round |
movie roundandbrown |
round and brown com |
full roundandbrown |
brown kara round |
com roundandbrown site |
round and brown sluts |
round n brown |
pretty round brown |
sex |
anime sex |
love sex |
free sex story |
hard sex |
group sex |
college sex |
web cam sex |
sex tape |
live sex show |
live sex |
real sex |
indian sex story |
japan sex |
teacher sex |
sex gallery |
sex search |
teacher sex |
cartoon sex |
latin sex |
sex picture |
mature sex |
japan sex |
amateur sex |
sex film |
group sex |
celebrity sex |
amateur sex |
sex story |
anal sex |
teeny bopper club |
bopper club kara teeny |
teeny bopper club cindy |
teeny bopper club sunshine |
teeny bopper club |
bopper clip club teeny video |
bopper club teeny tiger |
bopper club kayla marie teeny |
teenybopperclub |
teeny bopper club veronica |
bangbus melissa |
bangbus torrent |
bangbus facial |
bangbus melanie |
bangbus maritza |
bangbus kyra |
bangbus password username |
bangbus janet |
bangbus worldwide |
alishia bangbus |
hardcore naughty office |
coco hardcore naughty |
allie hardcore naughty |
hardcore naughty office |
hardcore naughty office |
hardcore naughty allie |
hardcore naughty allie |
hardcore milf naughty |
hardcore milf naughty |
hardcore naughty allie |
xxx proposal xxxproposal |
xxx proposal |
xxxproposal |
free sample video xxxproposal |
free xxx proposal |
xxx proposal video sample |
faith xxx proposal |
crystal xxx proposal |
jacky proposal xxx |
xxx proposal movie |
xxxproposal xxx proposal |
com xxxproposal |
franchezca proposal xxx |
daryn proposal xxx |
proposal rabbit review xxx |
suck me bitch
amazinganal
amazing anal
amazinggangbangs
amazing gang bangs
analpals
anal pals
analsweeties
anal sweeties
asiantease
asian tease
boobieclub
boobie club
brownhairgirls
brown hair girls
celebhotel
celeb hotel
cigarettesluts
cigarette sluts
circuspenis
circus penis
clubheshe
club heshe
club he she
clubtitties
club titties
digitalchicks
digital chicks
dildodippers
dildo dippers
dirtyxxxsex
dirty xxx sex
dreamkelly
dream kelly
ebonycheeks
ebony cheeks
fistbang
fist bang
footcravings
foot cravings
freshauditions
fresh auditions
freshfacials
fresh facials
freshteens
fresh teens
fuckingtoons
fucking toons
gir for girl
girlforgirl
grandegirls
grande girls
hardcoretoons
hardcore toons
hotnudegranny
hot nude granny
indiauncovered
india uncovered
interracialsexfest
interracial sex fest
kinkymaturesluts
kinky mature sluts
kuntfu
kunt fu
latinasex
latina sex
lipsticklesbo
lipstick lesbo
manhunter
man hunter
miniboobs
mini boobs
perfectorgy
perfect orgy
pimp4aday
pimp 4 a day
pompomporno
pom pom porno
pregnantbang
pregnant bang
redhairsex
red hair sex
secretfetishes
secret fetishes
sheshuge
shes huge
shockingcocks
shocking cocks
slutmovies
slut movies
suckmebitch
suck me bitch
sugarmamas
sugar mamas
superbush
super bush
tabooinsertions
taboo insertions
teenbody
teen body
teenfactory
teen factory
videoseekers
video seekers
Posted by: buy | June 29, 2007 at 19:15