by emptywheel
Via hilzoy via Glenn Greenwald, I found this description of Mubarak's attempts to broker peace between Hamas and Israel.
"Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak yesterday told the Cairo daily Al Ahram that he had drafted an agreement for the release of abducted Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit, but that it had been scuttled by outside pressure on Hamas.
"I would not be revealing any secrets by saying I had written portions of a dignified resolution to the soldier crisis," Mubarak said in the interview.
According to the Egyptian leader, Israel promised to release numerous Palestinian prisoners, and Hamas leader Khaled Meshal and Palestinian Authority Chairman Mahmoud Abbas had both been told. However, the agreement was not implemented due to pressure on Hamas.
"Then Hamas was pressured and entities I do not want to name intervened in the mediation. This blocked the impending agreement," Mubarak said."
To my mind, it's the most concrete evidence I've seen that Iran or Syria is stage-managing the growing chaos in the Middle East.
So what if Iran is behind the burgeoning regional war in the Middle East? My buddy Michael Ledeen calls this a Neville Chamberlain moment (making it, by my calculation, Neville Chamberlain moment #21,645 for Ledeen).
And finally, if we dither through this one, the next one will be worse. Maybe much worse. It's not going away. Stability is a mirage. Chamberlain had a choice between dishonor and war. He chose dishonor and got war anyway. You too, Mr. President. It's the way it works.
Now, as a student of Czech history, I get rather impatient with the inexactitude with which folks like Ledeen call Chamberlain moments. After all, Chamberlain's appeasement was important because it misread Hitler's intentions, but more importantly, because in ceding Czechoslovakia, he ceded a country that was much easier to defend militarily than Poland, and he ceded the considerable munitions manufacturing capabilities of Czechoslovakia, which proved to be a critical component of Hitler's war machine. In other words, Chamberlain made the wrong moral decision. But he also made ceded a critical strategic advantage.
Oh, and Chamberlain? He had some allies, allies that he might have used to effectively counter Hitler's advance.
As I watch these events unfold, I can't help but go back to a Thomas Hammes quote from that James Fallow war-gaming article that I used in my Harm and Pain post.
"What if they try to pre-empt us? What if we threaten them, and the next day we find mines in Baltimore Harbor and the Golden Gate, with a warning that there will be more? Do we want to start this game?" Such a failure of imagination—which Hammes said is common in military-run war games—has a profound effect, because it leads to war plans like the ones from Gardiner's CentCom, or from Tommy Franks, which in turn lull Presidents into false confidence. "There is no such thing as a quick, clean war," he said. "War will always take you in directions different from what you intended. The only guy in recent history who started a war and got what he intended was Bismarck," who achieved the unification of Germany after several European wars.
What if we threaten Iran, and it decides to pre-empt us? What if we assume we're going to be able to conduct some nice surgical strikes on Iran's nuclear capabilities and they decide to pre-empt us? What if we assume falsely that we'll be able to take out Iran while maintaining the stability of the Middle East? What if Iran manages to isolate us from the allies we might have brought along with us on the bombing runs--using Bush's utterly predictable unwavering support for Israel--at precisely the moment it chooses to engage us?
This is not a Neville Chamberlain moment because we have already ceded all strategic advantage. We have already given Iran the opportunity to dictate the terms of the battle with our little adventure in Iraq. Worse, we not only ceded advantage to Iran, but we gave it every incentive to use that advantage.
And it's not a Neville Chamberlain moment because, rather than taking the support we enjoyed after 9/11 to foster a more stable Islamic world, we squandered it. We don't have the options that England did in 1938.
We never had great options in Iran. And I strongly believe our best options were never military. But right now, we have no good options, largely because of the mess we've made in Iraq, because our government is a failure diplomatically, and because we've made this into a crusade that others don't want to join. But the solutions being offered by the Neocons and their allies--to engage in a full-scale Middle Eastern war--would be futile without first addressing the past mistakes of the Bush Administration.
Update: Here's part of an informative Steve Soto post (the conclusions of which I disagree with) which addresses some of the comments below.
In the most promising sign, Hezbollah’s sponsor Iran signaled that a prisoner swap and cease-fire were now possible as well. This comes as Hezbollah has shot down its first Israeli aircraft. Tony Blair and UN Secretary Kofi Annan supported international forces being inserted into southern Lebanon to reestablish a safe zone and ensure no further attacks from Hezbollah.
Both Syria and Iran now are supportive of a cease-fire and a prisoner swap to end this, but that will not change the fact that both countries supported the hostage takings in the first place, and both countries have been damaged as a result of this mistake. I stand by what I said yesterday, that Iran should be sanctioned and isolated as a result of this.
Also note however how the Israelis tipped their hands today. Olmert doesn’t want international peacekeepers to take over in southern Lebanon and get rid of Hezbollah militias. Instead, he wants Lebanon’s military to do it, which he knows full well is not capable of doing it. It calls into question whether Olmert wants Hezbollah expelled and the area made a safe zone, or whether he wants the ongoing pretext for invading and taking over southern Lebanon.
And here was the response I made in his comments:
This feels like more dumb posturing on both sides, and reinforces my belief that Israel and Iran are both trying to hasten a larger conflict. But I strongly disagree that Iran has miscalculated--at all--in this affair.
As you point out, Israel so far won't consider the logical thing, to bring in independent troops to establish a border zone. Therefore, their negotiations are only going to look like another attempt to use the vacuum of power they've created in Gaza and Lebanon as an excuse to maintain their own military presence. Which almost guarantees that Israel will remain engaged here.
But what Iran has done, in the last week, is manage to make the impending US attack on them into an Israeli-US attack. Which is going to have a radically different reception in the ME and the world as a whole. Whereas before the inordinate response in Lebanon, Putin was entertaining a grand bargain, now he's backing away from our "holy war." The more Iran can portray any military strike at it as a holy war, the less successful that strike will be.
Furthermore, I honestly think your suggestion that Bush "show the evidence" in your last post laughable. South Korea won't even trust our claims against North Korea, after our clear invention of intelligence to justify Iraq. You think the Islamic world is going to trust our claims against Iran (at least some of which have been overblown), and many of which depend on Iran's arming of Hezbollah, which looks really blinkered given our own arming of Israel.
Meanwhile, Iran now looks like a mediator. Israel can negotiate with Iran/Syria/Hezbollah/Hamas together. Or it can look like the aggressor (which, to some degree, it does in its extensive civilian attacks). But any further violence will look exactly like a US-Isreali attack on Islam (as the Neocons would like it to look). Which adds whole new levels of instability into any attempt to respond to Iran. It basically turns the entire Middle East into Iraq.
If you look at this from the perspective of Iranian mullahs having decided a US attack was inevitable, they've played this brilliantly.
Update: Here's Steve Clemons expressing justifiable concern at the notion of the US sending a giant target to the Mediterranean to escalate the war evacuate Americans.
Now comes the news that the U.S. is going to evacuate Americans caught in the crossfire in Lebanon by cruise ship on Tuesday.
I don't believe that the neocons would ever try to sabotage our rescue of Americans via a cruise liner. That would be too cynical of me -- and they are ideas people, not military practitioners.
But there are players on all sides of this conflict that may find a floating, slow, and poorly defended elephant of a ship too tempting of a target. Real or contrived, any potential attack would look like a Hezbollah attack.
I guess I'm more cynical than Steve. While it is a thoroughly boneheaded strategic decision, it is a brilliant decision if you 1) want to launch a war in the Middle East or 2) win the mid-terms. Either Hezbollah goes completely dark until the cruise ship disappears, to prevent getting blamed for another hit on the USS Liberty anything that happens. Or Hezbollah (which almost sank an Israeli warship already in the last week) gets greedy and we have, literally, Armageddon. So, from a strategic position, stupid stupid stupid. But from a 4G warfare perspective, in which perceptions of moral standing are everything? Smarter than anything the US has done so far.
Billmon has had some of the best analysis of the current situation, in which Israel seems to have painted itself into a corner, and Hezbullah with the backing of Iran seems bent on demonstrating that the consequences of an attack on Iran might be more serious than people have been thinking.
He also quotes from Ha'aretz this am, demonstrating that even faced with falling rockets the Israeli press and intellectuals have much more moral courage than folks do here:
Posted by: Mimikatz | July 17, 2006 at 09:58
Thanks Mimikatz, I haven't made it over to Billmon yet. But yes, he's been smack on on this.
Posted by: emptywheel | July 17, 2006 at 10:04
Billmon's latest post is cogent. If you have been overconfident about your military superiority you might do what the IDF is doing, because they seem to be all over the place. However international reaction is more of a brake on the IDF than it was on our troops during Vietnam, and the public wants the rockets to stop more than to bomb Lebanon into the stone age.
I read the entire story about Hezbollah's links to Syria and Iran in the NYT yesterday and was skeptical because of your post, emptywheel! There was little new information in the story.
Posted by: 4jkb4ia | July 17, 2006 at 11:50
I would also say that the IDF knows full well that there are two peoples claiming the same place. But the Arabs have a history of not wanting to share the place any more than the Jews do. Even if there was a secular state encompassing the two peoples, Hamas stands for a religious state for one people. Radical Islam would continue to pose a danger to that state.
Posted by: 4jkb4ia | July 17, 2006 at 11:54
I can no longer find the story but it claimed that the Iranian foriegn minister in Syria said that a cease fire should happen and a prisoner exchange. Isn't this similar to the Egyptian plan?
Posted by: sgiff | July 17, 2006 at 12:05
But about Hezbollah showing unseen military capacities he is 100% right. There is no flame war on Kos! I stumble around searching for meaning in life.
Posted by: 4jkb4ia | July 17, 2006 at 12:05
Brilliant editorial
I will take a stab at what sgiff wrote. A proposal acceptable to both sides would probably include a prisoner exchange, but what types of prisoners and how many Israel will release would be a difference between proposals.
Posted by: 4jkb4ia | July 17, 2006 at 12:10
Ledeen needs a movie made about him. He is just unbelieveable. He's the kind of person you'd say would need to be invented if he didn't exsist; but I suspect that he really doesn't exsist except in his own fevered imagination. I can't quite believe he takes himself completely seriously (although he would certainly have us do). There's always something ineffably bogus about him. It is so canny of you to focus on him, EW.
Thanks for the good post, as always.
Posted by: jonnybutter | July 17, 2006 at 12:11
Haaretz has currently got a story that the Iranian foreign minister is having talks with the Syrian government. No results were published.
Posted by: 4jkb4ia | July 17, 2006 at 12:13
jonnybutter
I keep waiting for them to discover something with Ledeen's name in it in the dossiers they've found in Italy, in the SISMI journalist's apartment. It would make for a good deal of amusement, in any case.
Posted by: emptywheel | July 17, 2006 at 12:14
I was skeptical of claims of Iranian involvement, just because the neocons and the Israelis are always looking for an excuse for the US to attack Iran. But I heard a report this weekend from the BBC correspondent in Beirut, discussing the regional press, who said that the Lebanese newspapers generally assume that Hezbollah is being directed by Iran and Syria. That doesn't make it true, of course, but it makes me less skeptical.
Posted by: Redshift | July 17, 2006 at 12:16
Thanks for the answer 4jkb4ia. This is the story I saw. http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/C3E26D64-180D-4D68-9EB4-8375D9E981BF.htm
Posted by: sgiff | July 17, 2006 at 12:29
Now the JPost has got it...
"Iranian Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki said Monday that a cease-fire and an exchange of prisoners would be acceptable and fair in the Israeli-Lebanese conflict...On Sunday, Lebanese officials said that Israel had sent the terms of a possible cease-fire through Italian mediators. The terms were the release of two captured Israeli soldiers, and a Hezbollah pullback to roughly 30 kilometers (20 miles) from the Israeli-Lebanese border."
Posted by: 4jkb4ia | July 17, 2006 at 13:12
Interesting that, as far as I've seen in brief surfing, only Syria and Iran are defending Hezbollah. I suppose it's too much to hope to see a concerted effort by ME countries to oppose Iran's plotting.
Posted by: kim | July 17, 2006 at 14:59
Well, Saudi Arabia has come out against Iran, but it would, since if Iran's stunt succeeds, Iran may replace Saudi Arabia as both the regional powerhouse and (because it would gain nominal control of the souther Iraqi oilfields), the swing oil producer in the world.
And places like Bahrain, which has a big Shiite population, oppose it because a regional war led by Iran might seriously destabilize its country.
And Iraq is going to oppose it. Nominally at least. Because it is still home to a hundred thousand American troops.
Posted by: emptywheel | July 17, 2006 at 15:39
Indulge yourself and find partners for hot Sexual Encounters and Adult Dating at Adult friend finder free dating site!
If you are looking for a one night stand or a casual encounter, then the Adult Swingers Club is where the game is played.
If you practice a different range of sexual and sensual activities then adult personals has the Club for you.
Download over 2000 adult dvd movies, available formats: windows, mpeg, psp and ipod!
Shop for Adult Toys, DVDs and Lingerie and other Erotic Adult Products at adult sex toys shop.
Posted by: Criss | June 29, 2007 at 14:52
Adult movie dvd store for best adult products including:
Sex toys and adult education - vibrators, dildos, anal toys, male sex toys, lotions, lubes, herbals, strap ons, books and video, sensual massage, light BDSM, lingerie and playwear, dolls and accessories.
Posted by: sex toys store | September 13, 2007 at 07:40
Allergy treatment drugs without prescription Allergy treatment drugs without prescription
Cetrizin without prescription Cetrizin without prescription
Promethazin without prescription Promethazin without prescription
Tavegil without prescription Tavegil without prescription
Telfast without prescription Telfast without prescription
Zyrtec without prescription Zyrtec without prescription
Anti Depressant drugs without prescription Anti Depressant drugs without prescription
Amineurin without prescription Amineurin without prescription
Amitriptylin without prescription Amitriptylin without prescription
Anafranil without prescription Anafranil without prescription
Cipralex without prescription Cipralex without prescription
Cipramil without prescription Cipramil without prescription
Citalopram without prescription Citalopram without prescription
Clomipramin without prescription Clomipramin without prescription
Effexor without prescription Effexor without prescription
Fevarin without prescription Fevarin without prescription
Fluoxetin without prescription Fluoxetin without prescription
Mianserin without prescription Mianserin without prescription
Mirtazapin without prescription Mirtazapin without prescription
Nortrilen without prescription Nortrilen without prescription
Paroxat without prescription Paroxat without prescription
Paroxetin without prescription Paroxetin without prescription
Remeron without prescription Remeron without prescription
Tofranil without prescription Tofranil without prescription
Zoloft without prescription Zoloft without prescription
Zyban without prescription Zyban without prescription
Antibiotics without prescription Antibiotics without prescription
Biaxin without prescription Biaxin without prescription
Cefixim without prescription Cefixim without prescription
Cephalexin without prescription Cephalexin without prescription
Clarithromycin without prescription Clarithromycin without prescription
Doxycyclin without prescription Doxycyclin without prescription
Gruencef without prescription Gruencef without prescription
Metranidazol without prescription Metranidazol without prescription
Penicillin without prescription Penicillin without prescription
Zithromax without prescription Zithromax without prescription
Anxiety treatment drugs without prescription Anxiety treatment drugs without prescription
Alprazolam without prescription Alprazolam without prescription
Bromezep without prescription Bromezep without prescription
Buspiron without prescription Buspiron without prescription
Diazepam without prescription Diazepam without prescription
Dormicum without prescription Dormicum without prescription
Lorazepam without prescription Lorazepam without prescription
Oxazepam without prescription Oxazepam without prescription
Rivotril without prescription Rivotril without prescription
Spasmorelax without prescription Spasmorelax without prescription
Strattera without prescription Strattera without prescription
Tavor without prescription Tavor without prescription
Tetrazepam without prescription Tetrazepam without prescription
Valium without prescription Valium without prescription
Xanax without prescription Xanax without prescription
Arthritis (Rheumatics) drugs without prescription Arthritis (Rheumatics) drugs without prescription
Allopurinol without prescription Allopurinol without prescription
Arcoxia without prescription Arcoxia without prescription
Celebrex without prescription Celebrex without prescription
Asthma treatment drugs without prescription Asthma treatment drugs without prescription
Atemur without prescription Atemur without prescription
Serevent without prescription Serevent without prescription
Singulair without prescription Singulair without prescription
Spiriva without prescription Spiriva without prescription
Birth Control drugs without prescription Birth Control drugs without prescription
Bella without prescription Bella without prescription
Clomifen without prescription Clomifen without prescription
Diane without prescription Diane without prescription
Duofem without prescription Duofem without prescription
Isotret without prescription Isotret without prescription
Blood Pressure treatment drugs without prescription Blood Pressure treatment drugs without prescription
Amlodipin without prescription Amlodipin without prescription
Atehexal without prescription Atehexal without prescription
Cardular without prescription Cardular without prescription
Clonidin without prescription Clonidin without prescription
Codiovan without prescription Codiovan without prescription
Coumadin without prescription Coumadin without prescription
Diltahexal without prescription Diltahexal without prescription
Enalapril without prescription Enalapril without prescription
Lisihexal without prescription Lisihexal without prescription
Lisinopril without prescription Lisinopril without prescription
Metoprolol without prescription Metoprolol without prescription
Norvasc without prescription Norvasc without prescription
Ramipril without prescription Ramipril without prescription
Tenormin without prescription Tenormin without prescription
Triarese without prescription Triarese without prescription
Verapamil without prescription Verapamil without prescription
Cardiovascular drugs without prescription Cardiovascular drugs without prescription
Atehexal without prescription Atehexal without prescription
Quinapril without prescription Quinapril without prescription
Cholesterol drugs without prescription Cholesterol drugs without prescription
Ezetrol without prescription Ezetrol without prescription
Simvastatin without prescription Simvastatin without prescription
Sortis without prescription Sortis without prescription
Zocor without prescription Zocor without prescription
Contraceptive drugs without prescription Contraceptive drugs without prescription
Evra without prescription Evra without prescription
Yasmin without prescription Yasmin without prescription
Dermatitis drugs without prescription Dermatitis drugs without prescription
Valtrex without prescription Valtrex without prescription
Diabetes drugs without prescription Diabetes drugs without prescription
Actos without prescription Actos without prescription
Amaryl without prescription Amaryl without prescription
Avandia without prescription Avandia without prescription
Glucobay without prescription Glucobay without prescription
Glucophage without prescription Glucophage without prescription
Meglucon without prescription Meglucon without prescription
Metformin without prescription Metformin without prescription
Diuretics Diuretics
Furorese without prescription Furorese without prescription
Furosemid without prescription Furosemid without prescription
Gastroenterology drugs without prescription Gastroenterology drugs without prescription
Agopton without prescription Agopton without prescription
Omeprazol without prescription Omeprazol without prescription
Influenza Influenza
Amantadin without prescription Amantadin without prescription
Tamiflu without prescription Tamiflu without prescription
Men's Health Men's Health
Avodart without prescription Avodart without prescription
Cialis without prescription Cialis without prescription
Levitra without prescription Levitra without prescription
Propecia without prescription Propecia without prescription
Proscar without prescription Proscar without prescription
Viagra without prescription Viagra without prescription
Xatral without prescription Xatral without prescription
Menopause drugs without prescription Menopause drugs without prescription
Climopax without prescription Climopax without prescription
Menogon without prescription Menogon without prescription
Presomen without prescription Presomen without prescription
Migraine drugs without prescription Migraine drugs without prescription
Formigran without prescription Formigran without prescription
Maxalt without prescription Maxalt without prescription
Migraeflux without prescription Migraeflux without prescription
Pirazetam without prescription Pirazetam without prescription
Relpax without prescription Relpax without prescription
Zomig without prescription Zomig without prescription
Muscle Relaxant drugs without prescription Muscle Relaxant drugs without prescription
Sirdalud without prescription Sirdalud without prescription
Somadril without prescription Somadril without prescription
Pain Relief drugs without prescription Pain Relief drugs without prescription
Azur without prescription Azur without prescription
Codeinum without prescription Codeinum without prescription
Combaren without prescription Combaren without prescription
Dolviran without prescription Dolviran without prescription
Fosamax without prescription Fosamax without prescription
Gelonida without prescription Gelonida without prescription
Ibuprofen without prescription Ibuprofen without prescription
Klipal without prescription Klipal without prescription
Metamizol without prescription Metamizol without prescription
Paracetamol without prescription Paracetamol without prescription
Piroxicam without prescription Piroxicam without prescription
Terbinafin without prescription Terbinafin without prescription
Tramadol without prescription Tramadol without prescription
Tramadolor without prescription Tramadolor without prescription
Voltaren without prescription Voltaren without prescription
Zaldiar without prescription Zaldiar without prescription
Parkinson's treatment drugs without prescription
Adekin without prescription Adekin without prescription
Sleep & Insomnia drugs without prescription Sleep & Insomnia drugs without prescription
Dalmadorm without prescription Dalmadorm without prescription
Nitrazepam without prescription Nitrazepam without prescription
Noctamid without prescription Noctamid without prescription
Planum(alternative) without prescription Planum(alternative) without prescription
Sonata without prescription Sonata without prescription
Stilnox without prescription Stilnox without prescription
Ximovan without prescription Ximovan without prescription
Zolpidem without prescription Zolpidem without prescription
Zopiclon without prescription Zopiclon without prescription
Weight Loss drugs without prescription Weight Loss drugs without prescription
Acomplia without prescription Acomplia without prescription
Antiadipositum without prescription Antiadipositum without prescription
Reductil without prescription Reductil without prescription
Regenon without prescription Regenon without prescription
Tenuate without prescription Tenuate without prescription
Xenical without prescription Xenical without prescription
Posted by: online prescription drugs | September 27, 2007 at 15:15