by DemFromCT
Kagro may not be around until late, so I'm offering a half-price discount for the holidays. Want to talk about the TIME poll? The weather? Hillary?
Have at it. This is an open thread.
« The Problem That Won't Go Away | Main | Obstructive Timelines »
The comments to this entry are closed.
yeah, I've got a question. When are you guys going to have a podcast? All this reading hurts my eyes.
Posted by: emptypockets | December 04, 2005 at 10:17
Oh, hey! I could do that! I'm a good reader. Just ask my kids. ;)
Posted by: LindyH | December 04, 2005 at 10:21
here's my favorite byte of news: Intelligent design meets its maker. I guess we're not in Kansas anymore.
Posted by: DemFromCT | December 04, 2005 at 10:38
'pockets, I'm terribly sorry. I'll try to make the Open Threads less wordy and ponderous.
Posted by: DemFromCT | December 04, 2005 at 10:39
"ponderous" is an awful wordy word, isn't it?
Posted by: RonK, Seattle | December 04, 2005 at 10:48
Heh. Me make Open Thread shorter.
Posted by: DemFromCT | December 04, 2005 at 10:49
Part 1. "Culture of Corruption." When that is hammered home, look for Part 2. How corrupted K Street Project Republicans are costing the American taxpayer. It's a smart strategy. It reaffirms the public's basic views that the GOP is too tied to big business interests and also reaffirms the "asshole Republican" image that "compassionate conservatism" was designed to mute. It also brings to the forefront one of the long-running beliefs about that Dems (that provides contrast with the GOP)... the Dems are for taking care of others. It allows Dems to re-cast the "Mommy party" stereotype as the "good neighbor" party.
Your thoughts?
Posted by: Newsie8200 | December 04, 2005 at 10:52
Newsie, well-put. I hadn't thought about it but I think somewhere between "kinder and gentler" and "restore honor" the asshole Republican stereotype got lost. I remember a joke during the Reagan years: "Have you heard that KFC is coming out with a new Republican chicken bucket? It's only the right wings and assholes." As apt now as then.
(See guys? This is podcast gold!)
Posted by: emptypockets | December 04, 2005 at 11:20
I'm too young to remember the Reagan years, but that joke doesn't ever go out of style...
I think the asshole Republican stereotype came back with the very obvious partisan witch hunt against Clinton.
Posted by: Newsie8200 | December 04, 2005 at 12:04
Newsie's formulation is great. It also gets us off this awful idea that the GOP current corruption is no different from the Dems in 1994.
The K Street Project sowed the seeds of its own destruction--any fool can see that today, with hindsight. But it has been incredibly corrupting. The idea that only reason the Dems aren't in it too is that they have no power ignores the fact that they never tried such an audacious scheme.
But "they all do it" absolves the press of doing the kind of serious coverage needed to really explain the K Street Project and its corrupting effect. Kind of like just regurgitating the Bush propaganda means not having to critically evaluate the arguments for war.
But "costs the taxpayer" is easy to understand. money for Halliburton means less money for schools. tax cuts for the wealthy means the non-wealthy have to support the gov't, or we just go into debt and have the kids pay for it.
Posted by: Mimikatz | December 04, 2005 at 13:37
We can amplify the "cost of corruption" impact by highlighting "Operation Offset" cutbacks taken up in this Congress, at the expense of ordinary Americans, and passed on narrow margins -- margins that would not have held is corrupt elected Republicans had been removed sooner.
And then we can pound home the big object lesson: There's no Compassion in Conservatism.
"Compassionate Conservatism" is a fig leaf ... a comforting conceit ginned up to deny the evident cruelties of selfservatism.
The big message: "We're on your side". The Democratic Party ("The Party of the Common Man") used to know how to say this, and mean it ... convincingly.
Posted by: RonK, Seattle | December 04, 2005 at 14:02
As to the KFC joke, it's employed just as much with left wings and Democrats ... and the once-commonplace understanding of patrician R's and plebian D's is greatly eroded.
Posted by: RonK, Seattle | December 04, 2005 at 14:06
Love that headline, "Intelligent Design meets its maker."
-- Rick
Posted by: al-Fubar | December 04, 2005 at 15:29
One of the reasons I strongly supported Edwards in the primaries last time was his evident committment to sweeping campaign finance reform. The way he sold it was exactly right: "(paraphrase, obviously) I will stand on the WH lawn regularly and tell the American people, in dollar amounts, what the legal corruption of our campaign finance system cost them lately". It's the same approach as newsie's, and just excellent. Not only does this flick down the lazy-eyed 'they all do it' meme, but it undermines bogus and/or expired liberal CW, much of which is currently met with bovine acceptance (including by liberals sometimes! gak!).
George Bush's line, 'it's your money' was very very strong; like most of his stuff, it was a gobsmackingly cynical con. But the line is good and very popular - for good reason. One liberal canard is that liberals (Democrats) want a 'nanny state' which will kill individual initiative (the lack of which was the only problem about Katrina, after all!). But the reality really doesn't jibe with that. Democrats actually want a fair tax code. Rare, these days, would be the vital exponent of American liberalism who wouldn't want regular working people to have more money in their pockets, or to actually get their money's worth for what they pay out. Republicans have ceded consensus (Eisenhower) conservatism to liberals, and (civil) libertarianism, too. The 'party of ideas' isn't really about anything anymore. A weakness, to put it mildly.
Focusing on what all this corruption - legal and otherwise - actually costs people is not only urgently needed good policy, but it's very good politics, too. What you choose to run on says a lot about you, and people are totally hip to that; it doesn't even necessarily matter that the goals you ran on aren't reached (kaff kaff, republicans, kaff - in fact, all the better for the gop that theirs aren't reached)! By choosing to highlight this stuff, the dem party would really be saying more than 'we're against corruption'. It would also be quietly saying: The Federal Government cannot, and does not want to, live your lives for you. We want to get down to brass tacks. We want to make sure you have more choices, but it's up to you what to do with them. The government's job is to honestly steward our national wealth. Corruption costs you personally, and costs the nation. It's your money.
I had a harrowing experience this weekend - a close encounter with the War On Christmas! I won't go into detail, but it involved watching the pathetic Jackie Mason on O'Reilly's show, and degenerated into blind, senseless, rage (not from me!). I was yelled at in the ugliest, most personal way for seeming to have the wrong opinion, and it all almost came to blows. (I'm definitely not a 'come to blows' kind of guy, unless I'm getting mugged). It shook me. These were friends. I've never experienced anything like it. It was blind cultural rage - fear, in other words.
People have so much anxiety these days. Weird as it may sound to some of us, some people really ARE worried about the government 'taking over their lives'; about LAWYERS wrecking everything (they don't consider that the representitives they support are being bought off by the companies who hire those lawyers); the War Against Boys; the war against the little guy and simple American values. You can find plenty of hypocrisy and absurdity about this stuff, but that doesn't dispatch the fact of this partially warranted fear, doesn't deal with it. I myself understand a lot of this anxiety, although I usually identify very different culprits. People want control over their lives, and there's absolutely nothing wrong with that. They get manipulated by shameless pimps like O'Reilly and politicans, but that doesn't mean that the anxiety itself is invented.
The problem with the current feedback loop is that Culture can mostly never be worked out legislatively, but repubs always run on cultural issues (for obvious reasons). Gay marriage and parental notification and ID and Schiavo are symbols more than central cultural issues, and these 'conservatives' have an endless supply of symbols. The Democrats have to be about: 'it's not the government's business to regulate morals or religion or culture or anyone's private life. Yes! Get the government off your back!' I know some liberals might not like that tack (vis a vis gay civil rights, for instance, which I strongly support); but, let's face it, the American People as a whole aren't particularly intolerant; their politics have been hijacked by cynical hucksters who stoke their fears. The conservatives are going to lose the 'culture wars' post-Bush anyway, so why not run to lead the WHOLE country, to take care of the big things? Like money! All this Kulturekampf stuff - as defined - is so symbiotic; and it's no upside for us, no downside for them. What I'm suggesting doesn't mean betraying liberal values, it means changing the basis of the conversation - which is remarkably easy to do if you have guts/nerve. It's an exposed flank we can attack if we ever figure out how to lighten up a little, be less literal.
ok, now that I've made this nice, quicksilver thread clotted...one more thing, since it's an open thread:
Via Eric Martin and the essential blog formally know as Liberals Against Terrorism (now called American Footprints), a must read essay by Yahia Said, the best thing I've read about Iraq in a long time. Every Democrat, every liberal should read it, IMO. It's on Democracy Arsenal, and I bet many have already, but...just in case.
Posted by: jonnybutter | December 04, 2005 at 16:38
Interesting about the TIME poll. It has him at 41, higher than most recent polls, but still his all-time low in that poll (42 in early September).
-- Rick
Posted by: al-Fubar | December 04, 2005 at 17:20
He's going to be at his all time low in all polls except rasmussen. That one can't decide what to do.
Posted by: DemFromCT | December 04, 2005 at 18:16
mature vs young hard mature women vieille salope mature amatrice mature fuck young young boy and mature mature vieille mature salope mature young first time mature and young boy < mature old fuck mature woman fucking girl hot mature men mature woman asshole mature pics free grosses.femmesmuresx.com grosse femme mature hairy bush mature mature hot movies film mature fuck dogs mature black busty photo penetration femme mature hot nasty mature galerie nylon mature brune mature nu hot wife mature blowjob woman mature mature free galerie rencontre femme mure femme mure amatrice cochon photo de femme mure hard cum her face mature photo x femme mure femme mure pour jeune homme 19ans mature mom cum photo gratuite fellation femme mure age mure nu gratuite x femme mure femme mure tres poilue photo femme mure amateur exhib rencontre coquin femme mure > femme mure et nu gratuit mure femme mure avec jeune mec recette and confiture and and mure photo x femme mure et ronde photo de femme mure xxx femme mure nu photo photo gratuite vieille mature nu mature busty babe gallery nymphomane mature amatrice lady mature mature drunk suck vieille saint girons photo vieille salope gratuit mature collant nylon galerie gratuite mature mature and granny mature lady posing femme amatrice mature vieille salope .com pipe hard concert hard rock berlin hard rock cafe black orchid rock nantes hard audrey tautou film hard archive journal hard pps hard ecoute musique hard rock couple hard roman photo hard film and x and hard photo hard de brigitte lahaie music hard core teen hard preview hard top nissan navara hard and top rencontre hard gratuite pps hard gratuit hard anal fucking photo gratuite femme hard peugeot dangel 505 hard top dvd x hard discount sodomie hard amateur pps humour hard liste hard discount essonne mature riding hard hard tv net hard xxx gratuit
Posted by: Frankeynstain | June 28, 2006 at 08:06