by DemFromCT
So while we await the indictments (and don't miss this NY Times story about Cheney's involvement), don't forget there's an Iraq war going on that sparked this whole mess in the first place. In fact, and you may not know this, it's not clear what the Constitutional result is yet, though the odds are it passed [Update: it passed, but almost didn't]:
Electoral rules mean the document will fail if three out of the 18 provinces vote "No" by two-thirds or more.
Salahuddin and Anbar both heavily voted against but Diyala, also Sunni, has backed the charter.
Now all eyes are on the largely Sunni province of Nineveh where the result is due to be announced within two days.
Meanwhile, we're very close to 2,000 American casualties deaths. And while this unfortunate landmark will be marked with sadness and vigils all over the country, wingers will flat-out lie and claim war opponents will be 'partying'. Well, Bush supporters don't have much to celebrate these days, so it's hardly surprising their apologists are a little worried.
"We are fighting too many fires, and taking too much friendly fire right now," the nauseated GOP strategist tells First Read. "There is really nothing [the White House] can do other than wait for it to pass, maybe catch a lucky break and rebuild." Some smart Democrats are starting to figure out "they have to do more than attack and sit there. If they start figuring that out as a party, we're toast."
Oh, and about that Cheney story. He may not get indicted over it, but he's as big a part of this story as Rove or his flunky, Libby. This WH lied to get us to go to war on false pretenses, and tried to savage anyone who opposed them, or get around them with secrecy.
"The case that I saw for four-plus years was a case I have never seen in my studies of aberrations, bastardizations, perturbations, changes to the national security decision-making process," Lawrence B. Wilkerson, Powell's former chief of staff and longtime confidant, said in a speech last week. "What I saw was a cabal between the vice president of the United States, Richard Cheney, and the Secretary of Defense, Donald Rumsfeld, on critical issues that made decisions that the bureaucracy did not know were being made."
You can't separate out Cheney from Plame any more. Wargate includes them both. And Fitz has the evidence to prove at least some of it. The rest is yet to come. Where does that leave us?
Facing a convergence of crises threatening his administration, President Bush and his team are devising plans to salvage the remainder of his presidency by applying the lessons of past two-term chief executives and refocusing attention on the president's larger economic and foreign policy goals.
Rarely has a president confronted as many damaging developments that could all come to a head in this week. A special counsel appears poised to indict one or more administration officials within days. Pressure is building on Bush from within his own party to withdraw the faltering Supreme Court nomination of Harriet Miers. And any day the death toll of U.S. troops in Iraq will pass the symbolically important 2,000 mark.
To deal with what they consider the darkest days of the Bush presidency, White House advisers have developed a twofold strategy -- confront head-on problems such as the Iraq death toll, while shifting attention to other areas such as conservative economic policies, according to a senior White House official, who spoke about internal deliberations only under the condition of anonymity. Bush advisers are taking clues from the playbooks of former presidents Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton, both of whom weathered second-term scandals.
The White House strategy will unfold over the next several days, starting with yesterday's announcement of a new Federal Reserve Board chairman and continuing today with a presidential speech on Iraq at Bolling Air Force Base. Anticipating a barrage of criticism when the death toll hits 2,000, Bush will try to put the sacrifice in perspective by portraying the Iraq war as the best way to keep terrorists from striking the United States again, the official said. He will make the same case in another speech Friday in Norfolk.
Although Bush has made this case often, aides hope the public will be more receptive in the aftermath of the apparently successful referendum vote for a new Iraqi constitution, whose official results will be announced this week
The cunning plan is to have Bush do the same thing he always does, only this time have it be successful. Dios mio. I don't know what's worse.. the mess we're in or the thought of Bush trying to 'do something' to get us out of it. Gephardt may not have made it out of the primaries, but he certainly was right about that 'miserable failure' bit.
What do you do with a guy that pretends to be Reagan but acts like Nixon? If you're a Democrat, you study overtures very carefully. And you don't buy a used car (or war) from this man.
Note that Steve Clemons is channelling emptywheel, with all the players laid bare... Bolton, Fleitz, etc... but not losing sight of the fact that Cheney knew.
Posted by: DemFromCT | October 25, 2005 at 02:56
Note also, for thought:
* Who leaked? not Libby or Cheney.
* why did Fitz leak Cheney's name today? (Because indictments are coming in the next 24 h?)
* Why did Fitz leak to the NY Times? Is this part of wanting a stronger Times?
* That was a triple anti-Judy story (Johnston, Stevensen and Jehl)? Someone teaching lessons here? "This is how you leak, and this is how you cover it."
Posted by: DemFromCT | October 25, 2005 at 07:54
it's official: Constitution passes.
I predict that this won't stop the violence, or make Iraq safer. In fact, it might alienate the Sunnis more.
Posted by: DemFromCT | October 25, 2005 at 08:01
Good summary. Clinton's "playbook," of course, is a non-starter. Completely useless to Bush. Reagan's is only slightly more so. Reagan had Gorbachev and the whole end of the Cold War thing going on. Lots of chances to play the statesman while the truth about Iran-Contra trickled out. Where can Bush go? Nowhere.
Nobody thinks the Republican strategists are fools. So I'm a bit skeptical that they are really drawing much from the Clinton or Reagan experiences. I would be looking at Johnson's playbook. I think that's what they saw the whole Social Security thing as--a monumental domestic-policy initiative to distract the public from an increasingly untenable, intractable war situation.
So I don't know. I guess I expect revised attempt at a major domestic-policy campaign for 2006. I don't think he can use Nixon's playbook re: the war, since it's hard to see him sending Condi on a secret mission to Iran/Syria, followed by Bush going to visit Tehran/Damascus. The split nature of the preceding sentence is the problem.
Posted by: TenThousandThings | October 25, 2005 at 08:10
TTT, he's been using the Nixon playbook all along: demonize Cleland and everyone running against him, his enemies. But you have to remember the last page of that book ended in disgrace. Another example of Bush not reading books as thoroughly as he should.
-----
A good post on Cheney: Larry Johnson: who told Dick Cheney?
Posted by: DemFromCT | October 25, 2005 at 08:27
Dem,
Howard Fineman said last night on the Joe Scarborough show that the person who leaked this story was Libby's lawyer, and that it did not come from Fitzgerald's office. Why would Libby leak this? I have no idea. Maybe to get ahead of the bad news? To signal that he's dumped Cheney? Hard to read this one.
Posted by: orchid314 | October 25, 2005 at 08:35
orchid314, thanks for that piece of info, which is odd (thanks for watching Scarborough last night so i didn't have to). I guess it is "let it out first, because it's coming anyway". What else could it be, assuming Fineman is right (and that's fact he's reporting, not an opinion)?
From the LA Times op-ed, btw, Wilkerson goes national with his 'cabal accusation'.
Posted by: DemFromCT | October 25, 2005 at 08:41
Thinking about it a little more, I'd say the only way Bush can save his presidency is to spend the next three years focused on finding solutions in Iraq. It's the only way out for him. The domestic, social-policy front will be fought out in the 2006 and 2008 elections. That's already out of his hands.
I don't think it is too late to make real progress in Iraq before 2008. But Bush doesn't have the courage to fire Rumsfeld and basically push Cheney out of the loop. So nothing will change. Look what you've won, George! Three autocratic Middle Eastern regimes that pretend to be democracies! What a novel concept! Congratulations! You must be thrilled!
Posted by: TenThousandThings | October 25, 2005 at 09:21
I think Ten makes a good point there that refocusing attention on Iraq to get it right is about the only drastic way for the Bush administration to put the wheels back on...
"The domestic, social-policy front will be fought out in the 2006 and 2008 elections. That's already out of his hands."
This sounds right, but I wouldn't overestimate the desire of the administration to cling to domestic issues out of habit. Seems like Bush as CEO delegated away his interest and input on Iraq sometime ago, and absent a shake-up at the Pentagon, I don't expect they will crack that nut unless uniformed leaders in the armed services are more assertive in their leadership. They have to burst the bubble of the WH and his civilian appointees, to direct ideas and information inward on what has been long a one way street.
Posted by: wd | October 25, 2005 at 09:50
Cheney is the key. Cheney was always the key. If Dem's were creatures of strategy, they'd have been softening him up for years.
And that borrowed playbook? Pfeh.
Metaphorically, Bush is approaching the sentencing phase of his trial-by-history ... the point where you introduce character witnesses and beneficiaries of your good deeds to win clemency from the sentencing judge.
The nub of W's predicament: lack of deeds.
Posted by: RonK, Seattle | October 25, 2005 at 10:09
Wow! I was not aware of Wilkerson's "cabal" argument. Strong stuff, especially if Powell remains silent and doesn't undercut him.
Wilkerson's thesis is probably important, though I'm not sure I really understand it. But his answer to his intitial question of "How did things get so screwed up?" has the ring of the voice of experience, and is easy to understand.
Posted by: TenThousandThings | October 25, 2005 at 10:10
It's a tiny point, and please pardon the pet peeve, but "casualties" refers not just to deaths, but also to serious injuries.
Posted by: kaleidescope | October 25, 2005 at 10:30
Isn't it remarkable how many elections in which Bush has a deep investment seem to turn on one key state/province, which miraculously goes his way by a small margin (amid stories of fraud)?
In this instance, winning probably isn't even winning -- the Sunnis so roundly rejecting the constitution (despite the "we can do it over later" agreement) only insures a continuance of the status quo...with, if anything, a higher anger quotient.
The "Clinton playbook" was, of course, competence, so that's totally out of reach for the Bushies (even beyond the fact that most Americans saw the pursuit of Clinton as illegitimate). The Reagan situation had much to do with it being past the midterm elections (leaving only a limited time to his term), as well as the sense that Iran/Contra was completely past, thus unrelated on ongoing activity. The problem for Bush is that, everything that's bringing him down (Iraq, hurricane unpreparedness, gas prices, demonization of opponents) is standard administration policy. How do you change the subject in your favor when what you are and what you do is precisely what people want changed?
Posted by: demtom | October 25, 2005 at 11:14
you're right... will correct.
Posted by: DemFromCT | October 25, 2005 at 11:14
demtom, that's reinforced by polls saying people want the next president to NOT follow Bush's policies.
Posted by: DemFromCT | October 25, 2005 at 11:20
mature vs young hard mature women vieille salope mature amatrice mature fuck young young boy and mature mature vieille mature salope mature young first time mature and young boy < mature old fuck mature woman fucking girl hot mature men mature woman asshole mature pics free grosses.femmesmuresx.com grosse femme mature hairy bush mature mature hot movies film mature fuck dogs mature black busty photo penetration femme mature hot nasty mature galerie nylon mature brune mature nu hot wife mature blowjob woman mature mature free galerie rencontre femme mure femme mure amatrice cochon photo de femme mure hard cum her face mature photo x femme mure femme mure pour jeune homme 19ans mature mom cum photo gratuite fellation femme mure age mure nu gratuite x femme mure femme mure tres poilue photo femme mure amateur exhib rencontre coquin femme mure > femme mure et nu gratuit mure femme mure avec jeune mec recette and confiture and and mure photo x femme mure et ronde photo de femme mure xxx femme mure nu photo photo gratuite vieille mature nu mature busty babe gallery nymphomane mature amatrice lady mature mature drunk suck vieille saint girons photo vieille salope gratuit mature collant nylon galerie gratuite mature mature and granny mature lady posing femme amatrice mature vieille salope .com pipe hard concert hard rock berlin hard rock cafe black orchid rock nantes hard audrey tautou film hard archive journal hard pps hard ecoute musique hard rock couple hard roman photo hard film and x and hard photo hard de brigitte lahaie music hard core teen hard preview hard top nissan navara hard and top rencontre hard gratuite pps hard gratuit hard anal fucking photo gratuite femme hard peugeot dangel 505 hard top dvd x hard discount sodomie hard amateur pps humour hard liste hard discount essonne mature riding hard hard tv net hard xxx gratuit
Posted by: Frankeynstain | June 28, 2006 at 08:25