By DHinMI
Marla Ruzicka is one of the heroes of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. While surely there has been heroism and courage shown by the men and women in our military who fight with great honor and courage in what many of us still consider a flawed and stupid war, the courage and heroism is not limited to those Americans in Iraq and Afghanistan who carried a rifle or drove a military vehicle. Marla Ruzicka's tools weren't rifles or Bradley fighting vehicles, but clipboards, computers, emails, and a remarkable ability to earn trust and persuade the powerful to do the right thing.
In her mid-twenties, Californian Ruzicka traveled to Afghanistan in the immediate aftermath of the fall of the Taliban to conduct an empirically sound count of civilian victims killed by US bombs, and then to lobby for compensation Afghan civilian victims of US bombings. After confirming 824 dead--she figured the actual number was much larger, but those were deaths she was able to confirm--she returned to the US, where she successfully lobbied U.S. Senator Patrick Leahy to sponsor a $3.75 million appropriation for the Afghan victims and their families.
Leahy, who in 1989 established the Leahy War Victims Fund, a $10 million annual appropriation used to provide medical, rehabilitation and related assistance to civilian victims of war, thinks highly of the young activist.
"Marla is an exceptionally determined, energetic and brave young woman who has traveled to the front lines to focus attention on an issue that too often gets ignored," he said. "Civilians bear the brunt of the suffering in wars today, but there is no policy to help them. Marla and her organization have helped put a human face on the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq by identifying the victims and their needs, and by lobbying for assistance."
Ruzicka had founded her own NGO, The Campaign for Innocent Victims in Conflict (CIVIC). After returning for a while to Afghanistan, where she helped prod the US authorities on disbursing the funds authorized by Leahy's legislation to the victims and their families, she eventually followed the US military into Iraq. As in Afghanistan, she conducted extensive door-to-door canvasses with local volunteers, this time placing special focus on Iraqis hurt or killed after George W. Bush's announced that the mission was accomplished.
The story of an attractive, engaging and resourceful young woman from California who succeeded in bonding with Iraqis victimized by errant bombs and jittery 19 year old's with M-4 rifles was quite a story, and she began to receive acclaim for her work and attention for her story. She was interviewed on Nightline, written about in plenty of serious news articles, and was even profiled in "lighter" news sources like Elle and something called Travel Girl. Predictably, the attention brought about carping from the right, like James Taranto's "Who Is Marla Ruzicka," which reads almost like a 1950's red-baiting screed published by the John Birch Society. Ruzicka seemed bemused by the attention, and by her own transformation from protester to successful advocate, as effective on an Iraqi doorstep as in a Capitol Hill office:
"It's true - just two years ago I was dragged out of the World Affairs Council when President Bush was speaking. It was his first trip to California, and I'd bought a ticket to hear him speak. I made my sarong-type skirt into a banner, and when he started his address, I unfurled it and jumped on a table and started shouting, 'Stop the rate caps now!' The cops grabbed me and took me out.
"These days, I'd rather have a meeting with President Bush than yell at him."
This has meant cozying up to a military she had formerly excoriated. "I'm constantly hitting them up for help, and I have learned that for the most part, they are anxious to help," she said. "The Marines have nicknamed me Cluster Bomb Girl because I would hear of places where they had gone off, and I would ask them to help me clear the area."
Leahy referred to her as a foreign policy "whistle blower." The BBC declared that the "most reliable numbers so far are the work of this woman, Marla Ruzicka." She spoke before the Soros-funded Open Society Institute, her work was incorporated into reports by Human Rights Watch, and she participated in a symposium sponsored by Harvard's Carr Center for Human Rights Policy along with top military leaders and theorists, military and political scholars, and accomplished writers and journalists.
But her focus remained on the innocent victims of war, like the three daughters of an Iraqi couple who were killed when an American tank swerved to avoid an exploding grenade and crushed their car. Doing her work in Iraq meant, of course, that she herself was often in danger. She was asked if she considered doing something safer, but her personal safety wasn't as strong a feeling as the satisfaction she received from doing work that was important and rewarding. "To have a job where you can make things better for people? That's a blessing...Why would I do anything else?"
Saturday morning she emailed this photo of herself with Harah, who was 3 months old when her entire family was killed by a U.S. rocket that destroyed the auto they were in. Later that morning Ruzicka and CIVIC's Iraq director Faiz Al Salaam drove near the Bagdhad airport to visit another little girl, one who had been injured by a bomb. As they drove along the airport road, a car bomb exploded, and both Marla and Faiz were killed.
In the months after 9-11 I read dozens of the obituaries in the NYT. I didn't know any of those people during their abbreviated lives; I only read about them after their deaths. I didn't know any of the over 1,500 soldiers who have died in Iraq. I didn't personally know Marla Ruzicka, but ever since I first heard of her in early 2003 I've admired her immensely. I once heard an interview with David Puttnam, the producer of films such as Chariots of Fire and The Killing Fields. He talked about how great films can inculcate in the viewer the conceit that, were they in the same circustances as the film's hero, they would act with equal courage, honor and distinction. Hearing about Marla Ruzicka inspired in me a similar conceit. She was an American, though extraordinary still enough like the rest of us that we could feel a little better knowing our country had produced such a brave, heroic and patriotic woman.
Marla Ruzicka challenged American citizens and institutions by appealing to our sense of right and wrong and our belief that innocents shouldn't be neglected victims. "Although we do advocacy," she told the Harvard International Review, "we are not about being for or against the war. Not at all. We are about the people who make the decisions--getting them to do the right thing, getting them to do what the American people want. Americans hate civilian causualties."
Especially when the civilians killed are such great Americans as Marla Ruzicka.
Interesting perspective from a military man over at Alterman's blog. Granted, he's posting on Alterman's blog and not Command Post or Little Green Footballs, but he's quite positive about Ruzicka:
"...Campaign for Innocent Victims in Conflict (CIVIC), had as its mission, the cataloging of civilian deaths in this war. That is a task which the military does not pursue (nor, for what it is worth, has any military ever done so), and Ms. Ruzicka thought it important that these numbers should be counted. But more significantly, from where I sit, is the fact that she did not catalog numbers from the safety of a desk in some London office. She did not just compile news clippings and then post them on the alternet. She came here, lived here, and attached a human face to those casualties. Then she worked to relieve their suffering. She learned the systems, first agitating in Washington, DC, and eventually here. She did so even to the degree of working with the military to help distribute funds for the victims which the military has for that purpose, all of this in order to help innocent people. In the end, it seems, she left politics aside in favor of practical reality and set her shoulder to work for humans, not just ideals. Nobody I know opposes an objective such as that."
Posted by: DHinMI | April 18, 2005 at 13:25
In these days when the term "hero" is applied promiscuously for the most mundane behavior, thanks, DHinMI, for putting the spotlight on a true hero, one who gave of herself with no apparent thought of reward beyond the personal satisfaction obtained from saving lives. She will no doubt never get a presidential Medal of Freedom or much of the other recognition she deserves. But she will nevertheless not be forgotten.
Posted by: Meteor Blades | April 18, 2005 at 16:56
A good life and a long life are not the same thing.
Posted by: RonK, Seattle | April 18, 2005 at 21:16
Y'know, I think maybe it *would* be worthwhile to push for Marla being awarded a Presidential Medal of Freedom -- and/or its Congressional equivalent, the Congressional Gold Medal. And the Internet is just the way to do it, too. We might be able to generate enough buzz to *shame* the Bushites and the GOP Congressional Politburo into doing the right thing.... I'd say let's go for it.
Posted by: Skip Mendler | April 21, 2005 at 22:44
"Predictably, the attention brought about carping from the right, like James Taranto's 'Who Is Marla Ruzicka,' which reads almost like a 1950's red-baiting screed published by the John Birch Society...." [link to July 22, 2002 article].
Great example of selective "journalism". If you were interested in the truth, you might also have referenced Taranto's retraction on April 18 this year:
"From what we'd read when we wrote about her almost three years ago, Ruzicka sounded like a typical Angry Left prima donna. But an August 2004 report in the Washington Post persuades us that either we judged her too harshly or she matured in the last few years of her life:"
http://www.opinionjournal.com/best/?id=110006574
But then that might disillusion all those among your readership who believe that "carping from the right" is "predictable" "red-baiting [John Birch Society] screed".
Taranto had the guts to go back and tie up loose ends. Do you?
Posted by: Rodney A. Hoiseth | April 23, 2005 at 02:54
mature vs young hard mature women vieille salope mature amatrice mature fuck young young boy and mature mature vieille mature salope mature young first time mature and young boy < mature old fuck mature woman fucking girl hot mature men mature woman asshole mature pics free grosses.femmesmuresx.com grosse femme mature hairy bush mature mature hot movies film mature fuck dogs mature black busty photo penetration femme mature hot nasty mature galerie nylon mature brune mature nu hot wife mature blowjob woman mature mature free galerie rencontre femme mure femme mure amatrice cochon photo de femme mure hard cum her face mature photo x femme mure femme mure pour jeune homme 19ans mature mom cum photo gratuite fellation femme mure age mure nu gratuite x femme mure femme mure tres poilue photo femme mure amateur exhib rencontre coquin femme mure > femme mure et nu gratuit mure femme mure avec jeune mec recette and confiture and and mure photo x femme mure et ronde photo de femme mure xxx femme mure nu photo photo gratuite vieille mature nu mature busty babe gallery nymphomane mature amatrice lady mature mature drunk suck vieille saint girons photo vieille salope gratuit mature collant nylon galerie gratuite mature mature and granny mature lady posing femme amatrice mature vieille salope .com pipe hard concert hard rock berlin hard rock cafe black orchid rock nantes hard audrey tautou film hard archive journal hard pps hard ecoute musique hard rock couple hard roman photo hard film and x and hard photo hard de brigitte lahaie music hard core teen hard preview hard top nissan navara hard and top rencontre hard gratuite pps hard gratuit hard anal fucking photo gratuite femme hard peugeot dangel 505 hard top dvd x hard discount sodomie hard amateur pps humour hard liste hard discount essonne mature riding hard hard tv net hard xxx gratuit
Posted by: Frankeynstain | June 28, 2006 at 08:24