Updated.
by Kagro X
Steve Clemons has been the point man on the Bolton nomination since the beginning. You need only click on his Washington Note and scroll down to get the full run-down on the disaster that's unfolding in the Senate.
This morning, he calls for some action:
One Senator -- any U.S. Senator -- can go down to the floor of the U.S. Senate today at 2 p.m. and say the following:
Mr./Madame Chairman:
As the U.S. Senate has been in session for more than two hours, I hereby object to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee meeting. . .until adequate and complete answers posed by esteemed Members of this Senate to the administration are responded to, in full, by the administration.
Until that occurs, I object to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee holding further meetings.
That would shut the committee down. It would create another delay, and every single day that there has been more time, another major story has emerged on John Bolton.
He's right, and such action would have important implications beyond the Bolton nomination.
Senate Dems ought to consider filibustering this vote for a number of reasons. They needn't necessarily do this with an eye toward permanently preventing a final vote, but such a move would provide an opportunity to get clarity on a few key issues:
- First and foremost, Bolton's actual fitness for the job;
- A clear demonstration for the public of the filibuster in its best light -- that is, using it to delay a fast-tracked vote, where additional consideration has proven necessary in light of startling new evidence, and;
- A test of the will of Republicans to use the "nuclear option" -- the nucleo-con theory says that filibustering a presidential nomination is unconstitutional because the "advice and consent" clause requires an up-or-down vote. Curiously, there's been no mention of this with respect to non-judicial appointments. We should find out whether the nucleo-cons really mean what they say, or whether they only mean it with respect to judges -- i.e., issues they can use to populate rallies broadcast via satellite from Kentucky megachurches.
In this nomination, there's a clear case to be made that delay is warranted. Use the tools you're given, and show people what they're good for. Nucleo-cons want to make this not only a fight over judges, but over the supposed "evil" of the filibuster itself, casting back to its use by Southern racists. The Bolton nomination offers a rare opportunity to test both this assumption and the half-assed "constitutional" objection upon which the nuclear option is, when convenient, based.
Fancy that. Bill Frist using parliamentary parlor tricks to prevent Senators from providing their "advice and consent" on a presidential nomination. Anyone know where we can get access to a well-lighted Kentucky megachurch, quick?
Update: Clemons now says Frist has recessed the Senate in a bit of procedural trickery designed to prevent Bolton opponents from blocking the Foreign Relations Committee vote on the nomination today.
Update 2: More procedural goings on. Apparently the Senate stands in recess until 5, by majority vote, following Boxer's objection.
Something the Republicans have proved most adept at is changing the rules for their own benefit - whether it's for blue-slipped judge nominees or redistricting mid-Census. I've always found their arrogance in this astonishing. But changing the "rules" regarding "advice and consent" so they can have it both ways simultaneously is breathtaking even for them.
If the Democrats ever get back into power, I hope they are as willing to play hardball - doing so ethically, of course - as the GOP has proved itself capable of.
Posted by: Meteor Blades | April 19, 2005 at 15:06
The hearing is on C-SPAN 3. And Bolton's got his 10 votes.
When I look at the chess board, this means one thing to me:
Frist has his 50 votes.
And the time between now and November 2006 is going to be very interesting.
-----
The next decision is going to be whether or not the Dems will filibuster Bolton on the Senate floor.
At first glance, I hope they don't. I think a trap is being set...
Posted by: Petey | April 19, 2005 at 15:49
Do you think so? Let's discuss the trap, because I think this is an unique opportunity, and I'd encourage it. Why not make them change the script for "Justice Sunday?"
Posted by: Kagro X | April 19, 2005 at 16:18
"Let's discuss the trap..."
Puts the Dems in the position of using the filibuster to defend the UN and multilateralism ahead of the nuclear option fight.
Moves the filibuster fight into the territory of national security.
Helps the GOP increase polarization on the filibuster fight.
-----
If I put myself into Frist's or Rove's shoes, I'd welcome kicking off the real action on the nuclear option debate with Bolton. I'd think the thematics would play in my direction.
Posted by: Petey | April 19, 2005 at 16:33
Fucking George Voinovich !?!
Posted by: Petey | April 19, 2005 at 16:34
I obviously see it the opposite way, but that might stem from the guesswork we're both doing about whether or not Frist has the votes.
I think the judicial nominees have the bearing and decorum to pass, perhaps barely, as sympathetic figures. Plus, so much groundwork has been done to sell them as the ambassadors on the bench of "people of faith."
Not so with Bolton. He's repugnant, and an arrogant boss (something people understand) to boot. Considering that "Justice Sunday" is supposedly about ridding the bench, and government in general, of just such arrogance, forcing the inevitable use of the nuclear option on unexpected ground may be to our advantage.
If it's coming, it's coming. Why let it happen according to their plan?
Posted by: Kagro X | April 19, 2005 at 16:38
How weird, unexpected, and dramatic was that?
Posted by: Petey | April 19, 2005 at 16:48
In this age of pre-scripted political theatre, you don't hardly get sudden twists like that.
What now?
Posted by: demtom | April 19, 2005 at 16:50
Well, I must admit I wasn't expecting a dramatic entrance from Voinovich, but it's not entirely out of the blue. In the comments to "Notes" Part III, I noted that Voinovich was reportedly on the fence regarding the nuclear option.
It might be that he sees this in the same terms. I certainly do.
Posted by: Kagro X | April 19, 2005 at 16:55
So, did Voinovich just push any Bolton filibuster possibility back beyond the "Justice Sunday" window, and possibly into post-nuclear option territory?
Either the GOP is now ready to accede to killing his nomination in committee, or they're going to enhance the nuclear option to cover the entire executive calendar.
Posted by: Kagro X | April 19, 2005 at 17:26
Confirming my "no vote" forecast. I'll let that one ride for the next round, too.
They'll still try to spin this to paint D's as obstructionists, but in this case I don't think it'll sell with the public ... or within thier own caucus.
Posted by: RonK, Seattle | April 19, 2005 at 18:39
Voinovich is an obstructionist, and maybe Hagel, too... no, that's not got the same ring to it as 'Democrats are obstructionist'.
You're right, RonK... won't sell.
Posted by: DemFromCT | April 19, 2005 at 19:10
"Confirming my "no vote" forecast. I'll let that one ride for the next round, too."
I also had a "no vote" forecast, at least until today's hearing began and Lugar let everyone know he had the votes. (It was weird - after Voinovich spoke, Lugar seemed like the last person in the room to understand what had just happened. It took him a while to realize he could no longer call for a vote today.)
And as for the next round, while the details are still uncertain, I'd say the odds of Bolton ever going to the UN just moved to somewhere between slim and none.
The ramifications of this are huge. It's the first Senate rebuke to this administration on foreign policy ever. It's the first win for State against Cheney in a very long time. And just as I thought Bolton's confirmation augured a Frist nuclear vote triumph, these developments indicate that things are probably still uncertain on the nuclear front...
Posted by: Petey | April 19, 2005 at 20:22
(It was weird - after Voinovich spoke, Lugar seemed like the last person in the room to understand what had just happened. It took him a while to realize he could no longer call for a vote today.)
Huh-huh, yeah. That was cool. Huh-huh-huh.
Posted by: Kagro X | April 19, 2005 at 22:16
Indulge yourself and find partners for hot Sexual Encounters and Adult Dating at Adult friend finder free dating site!
If you are looking for a one night stand or a casual encounter, then the Adult Swingers Club is where the game is played.
If you practice a different range of sexual and sensual activities then adult personals has the Club for you.
Download over 2000 adult dvd movies, available formats: windows, mpeg, psp and ipod!
Shop for Adult Toys, DVDs and Lingerie and other Erotic Adult Products at adult sex toys shop.
Posted by: Robert | June 29, 2007 at 17:03