Paulose Resigns
by emptywheel
I think it's great that Rachel Paulose has resigned (h/t JF)
Rachel Paulose, the embattled U.S. attorney for Minnesota, will be leaving the post to take a position at the Justice Department in Washington, according to a Bush administration official and a congressional aide.
According to a news release sent by the department of justice, Paulose has accepted a position as Counselor to the Assistant Attorney General for Legal Policy at the Department of Justice in Washington, D.C. Ms. Paulose will resign from her current position and assume her new role effective in early January 2008.
But why in god's name are we keeping her on the taxpayer's dime?
I can only imagine that her claims that she's being targeted because she's a Federalist Society member would make her hard for someone to fire...
The McCarthyite hysteria that permits the anonymous smearing of any public servant who is now, or ever may have been, a member of the Federalist Society; a person of faith; and/or a conservative (especially a young, conservative woman of color) is truly a disservice to our country.
...particularly someone who had to be vetted by the Federalist Society to get his job. But c'mon folks!

You type much faster than I do! ;)
Posted by: hauksdottir | November 19, 2007 at 16:47
Along with her claims that she's being targeted because she's female, minority, and a few other things? Weren't all of those the reasons given for hiring her and putting her there (except for the Federalist Society membership, that is)?
Posted by: P J Evans | November 19, 2007 at 16:50
PJ
Oh, the Federalist Society thing WAS part of why she was put there in the first place, yes.
Posted by: emptywheel | November 19, 2007 at 16:52
Well, I guess you have seen this then. I just love this part, "The McCarthyite hysteria that permits the anonymous smearing of any public servant who is now, or ever may have been, a member of the Federalist Society...". Who's anonymous? We are right here, which makes it a hell of a lot easier for you to find me, discuss things with me etc. than if you had my rather common sounding name, of which there must be hundreds of thousands of similarly named individuals out there. The Papoose has a screw loose....
Posted by: bmaz | November 19, 2007 at 16:56
Wouldn't it seem reasonable that she is simply being kept on our dime because she is a reliable wingnut who can be counted on to be a good soldier in god's fight against the heathen hordes?
Posted by: Markinsanfran | November 19, 2007 at 16:59
Mark
Yeah, though I do wonder if she threatened to launch an employment discrimination lawsuit.
I also find it curious that she was absolutely silent until about the time Mukasey was confirmed, and then bitched about her persecution, and voila! New job!
Posted by: emptywheel | November 19, 2007 at 17:02
She wouldn't stoop to hiring one of those evil trial lawyers, now would she? Actually, it would be entertaining to see her attempt to represent herself :-)
I have a feeling that there are four AUSA's who will be having a big party tonight :-)
Posted by: Markinsanfran | November 19, 2007 at 17:07
Oh yeah.
Now let's see whether Mukasey/Bush have the tact to either hire one of them to close out the term, or bring back Heffelfinger for a third shot.
Posted by: emptywheel | November 19, 2007 at 17:10
I think the deal had already been agreed to, or at a minimum the decision made in DC, to take this action. Mukasey made a pretty clear comment when he said he "was going to have to take a look at the Minnesota situation" or something to that effect.
Posted by: bmaz | November 19, 2007 at 17:11
Looks like the prostitution lobby is once-again asserting its all-powerful tentacles.
Posted by: EH | November 19, 2007 at 17:21
Oh, man, I forgot that doozy, EH. So then DOJ must be the prostitution lobby?
Posted by: emptywheel | November 19, 2007 at 17:23
All the better to “help” with the DOJ investigation of her tenure here in Minnesota.
With all the DOJ resignations, they ain’t got nobody to work on the Paulouse…oops, I meant Paulose investigation.
And using “Junya’s Logic”, it seems best if Rachel does the work since she knows the most about it.
Makes a kinda sense, doncha know?
Posted by: Mad Dogs | November 19, 2007 at 17:29
Is being a Federalist akin to having a disease or something? ;-) Does that prevent her from being terminated for cause?
Posted by: sojourner | November 19, 2007 at 17:31
EW
Well, they didn't really say she got the job because of being a Federalist. Not that that wasn't a big part of it, of course. The female/minority/etc was the icing hiding the rest.
I hate cynicism being the right response to everything these guys do.
Posted by: P J Evans | November 19, 2007 at 17:35
As unpleasant as it may be to have Ms. Paulose continue to draw a federal paycheque, I think that it would be money very well spent to buy out all the Bushbots that have been appointed to the civil service the last 7 years, and in particular, at the DOJ. Much cheaper than undoing all the damage they could continue to inflict on the world if they were to get civil service tenure.
Posted by: Ishmael | November 19, 2007 at 17:47
One more time! In May I wrote this post on Lukery's blog about Gonzales and Rachel, complaining about a campaign of terror they were conducting which came to be known as the "Innocent Images National Initiative." It caused a lot of hard feelings. And I'm not so smart, I had a factual inaccuracy about Rachel, which I was willing to correct.
I could be wrong, but I strongly suspect Rachel needs a little cover from the angry friends and families of people who committed suicide after their convictions under IINI (and who I guess said, "hey DoJ, WTF?"). Nobody wants to talk about that, but I don't mind.
Posted by: Uranus | November 19, 2007 at 18:12
Ishmael: and it will presumably be easier for the next president to fire her from main DOJ, where her job probably will consist of keeping her face out of the papers for the next 13 months, than it would be to fire her from a job where she could make an argument that she's actually responsible for, you know, upholding the law and stuff.
Posted by: tekel | November 19, 2007 at 18:18
Sen. Vitter must have put a lot of pressure on DOJ to get rid of her.
Posted by: AZ Matt | November 19, 2007 at 18:24
LOL
That's a good one, AZ Matt.
Posted by: emptywheel | November 19, 2007 at 18:25
Maybe now that Rachael's becoming a flashpoint, they just want to bury her somewhere obscure where they can keep an eye on her. Or... maybe they have some fresh "talent" they want to install in her Minnesota slot.
Posted by: Hmmm. | November 19, 2007 at 18:38
In January they'll announce she's going to become the new head of the Voting Rights Section. Just in time for the primaries and the general. Ugggghhh.
Posted by: DeeLoralei in Memphis | November 19, 2007 at 18:56
Tekel - agreed, it would be easier to can her from an HQ job - if Rachel P were still a USA, I can see the headlines now, filled with Republican "outrage" that the Democratic President "dared" to interfere with USA positions by firing incumbents! :) I still remember how much heat Hillary took for the White House Travel Office staffing - what would happen if she cleared out the Bushbots from the civil service relying on just cause? Better to give the wingnuts some more welfare, I think they would take surprisingly little to leave rather than, you know, work or something! :)
Posted by: Ishmael | November 19, 2007 at 19:00
Tekel and Ishmael - You may be right, but I don't know that your read is necessarily correct. US Attorneys are quite easy to dispense with by an incoming administration, and they commonly are. We have just spent a year of the Bush Administration and their conservative/GOP apologists (the very same people, and in fact the only people, who might possibly support Rachael Screwloose) beat into our heads that USAs can and should be fired at any time for any reason. On the other hand, depending on the nature of the "counselor's" position (that is a little vague) she is being given at DOJ Main, it is possible that she will actually be in a "career position" that is much harder to remove her from than a political appointment USA position.
Posted by: bmaz | November 19, 2007 at 19:12
"...a member of the Federalist Society; a person of faith; and/or a conservative (especially a young, conservative woman of color)..."
She's saying she has all the 'right beliefs,' so if they are going to pluck the one titty out of her mouth, then they should shift her over to the other.
When faced with charges of Gross Incompetence and a Staff Revolt, Rachel played the Loyalty Card to save her career.
Posted by: radiofreewill | November 19, 2007 at 20:17
I would also point out that I will bet Norm Coleman has been absolutely screaming for them to do something like this and get Paulose out of Dodge well before the election campaign shifts into high gear. Paulose remaining as Minnesota USA was an albatross around Coleman's neck.
Posted by: bmaz | November 19, 2007 at 20:17