George Bush Obstructs Justice
by emptywheel
Well, George did it. Made sure that Scooter wouldn't flip rather than do jail time. He commuted Libby's sentence, guaranteeing not only that Libby wouldn't talk, but retaining Libby's right to invoke the Fifth.
This amounts to nothing less than obstruction of justice.
Here's Bush's statement, in which a guy who is pushing to restore minimum sentencing laws says that Libby's sentencing--which was the minimum according to the guidelines, was too tough:
Mr. Libby was sentenced to thirty months of prison, two years of probation, and a $250,000 fine. In making the sentencing decision, the district court rejected the advice of the probation office, which recommended a lesser sentence and the consideration of factors that could have led to a sentence of home confinement or probation.
I respect the jury's verdict. But I have concluded that the prison sentence given to Mr. Libby is excessive. Therefore, I am commuting the portion of Mr. Libby's sentence that required him to spend thirty months in prison.
Update: Here's an article about how the Bush Administration is pushing to restore minimum sentencing guidelines. And don't forget that in AL, a judge has just upped the sentence against Don Siegelman.
Update: Here's a link to the post showing that the research into the Wilsons went into overdrive as soon as Bush expressed a concern about the Niger allegations.

Yes. Justice denied. Raw absolute power being exercised ruthlessly.
Posted by: PeterB | July 02, 2007 at 18:20
Time to get Scooter disbarred, stat. Scooter at Hudson, Wolfowitz at AEI, now all we need is Doug Feith at Heritage.
I'm going to go throw up now.
Posted by: Gary | July 02, 2007 at 18:22
I agree that Scooter can avoid pleading the 5th while his appeals remain alive, but not afterwards. Also, Bush can still pardon Scooter later, on the way out the door, via impeachment or otherwise. The clemency power is not a one-shot deal, one mercy per customer. This is Sat Night Massacre big, IMHO. I think the impeachment machine just got a jump-start, and not just in prog-blog land.
Posted by: Ishmael | July 02, 2007 at 18:23
Impeach NOW!!
Posted by: Former Fed | July 02, 2007 at 18:24
Libby will lose his right to take the Fifth if he is given immunity by either Fitzgerald or the Congress. It would be hard for even this president to explain an invocation of executive privilege to keep Libby from testifying about his crimes in front of congress, don't you think?
Posted by: CMike | July 02, 2007 at 18:24
Bush is a coward, and he just proved it.
Posted by: Woodhall Hollow | July 02, 2007 at 18:25
sad to hear, marcy et a l
Posted by: lukery | July 02, 2007 at 18:27
Also Marcy, based on your other observations today, could PF resurrect the espionage act charges, there would be no double jeopardy to prevent the prosecution. PF must be having some agonizing decision-making this week.
Posted by: Ishmael | July 02, 2007 at 18:27
I just wrote Boxer, Feinstein, and Big Hank, pointing out that it's Impeachment Time. Hank got the long list of reasons, including the non-compliance with subpoenas and the appointment of incompetents.
I may become less p*ssed off in, oh, two or three years. My pitchfork is now be-ribboned and ready to use.
Posted by: P J Evans | July 02, 2007 at 18:28
By the way, if Shrub is going to use the 'excessive prison time' argument, shouldn't he at least have waited until Libby had served at least a day, just to make it look nice?
Posted by: P J Evans | July 02, 2007 at 18:30
So thirty months is excessive?
Does that mean that 0 days is just right?
Posted by: *xyz | July 02, 2007 at 18:31
I never thought he'd actually do it. Does this mean that Bush gave the leak order? Why else would he taint himself like this?
Posted by: tekel | July 02, 2007 at 18:33
We are now going to see whether Patrick Fitzgerald is just a very skillful lawyer, or a principled instrument of Justice.
Posted by: sponson | July 02, 2007 at 18:33
So Bush has made his move.
I'm very curious to see how we, our elected representatives, the CIA, and Patrick Fitzgerald respond.
Posted by: *xyz | July 02, 2007 at 18:34
but retaining Libby's right to invoke the Fifth.
I agree that Scooter can avoid pleading the 5th while his appeals remain alive, but not afterwards
The thing is, he hasn't taken the fifth even when he has a right to. If the investigation were to continue, why would he not tell the exact same story he has already told?
Posted by: Maybeex | July 02, 2007 at 18:34
Let's not forget, Bush was the trigger man on the Plame-out - with Cheney playing him on like Iago. This is real Nixon, obstruction of justice territory, and the US v. Nixon criminal investigation exception to executive privilege will apply, and PF can keep things going. Bush had much to gain from the commutation, and we need to get this message out - cui bono from the commutation as least as much Scooter?
Posted by: Ishmael | July 02, 2007 at 18:35
Listen to this bullshit from shrub:
"My decision to commute his prison sentence leaves in place a harsh punishment for Mr. Libby. The reputation he gained through his years of public service and professional work in the legal community is forever damaged. His wife and young children have also suffered immensely. He will remain on probation. The significant fines imposed by the judge will remain in effect. The consequences of his felony conviction on his former life as a lawyer, public servant, and private citizen will be long-lasting."
No mention, no sympathy for the actual victims in the case. It's all about poor libby.
Posted by: spud | July 02, 2007 at 18:35
Wow. Didn't think he'd actually do it. Your move, Mr Fitzgerald. I have little hope that our Congress will do the right thing.
Posted by: Frank Probst | July 02, 2007 at 18:39
xyz asks:
...why would he not tell the exact same story he has already told?
If, under oath, he continues to "tell the exact same story" he will be committing new crimes of prosecutable perjury.
Posted by: CMike | July 02, 2007 at 18:40
Memo to the White House Press Corpse: The "ongoing investigation" and "until the appeals process is completed" dodges are now null and void. Please start asking questions now.
Posted by: Frank Probst | July 02, 2007 at 18:41
Ishmael
I was wondering just that, whether he held those in reserve for precisely this moment.
I'd do it. But then again, I'm perhaps more zealous than the runaway PatFitz
Posted by: emptywheel | July 02, 2007 at 18:44
I just called my congresscritter, and the conversation devolved into a screaming match
and if that putz on the phone thinks I'm pissed off, he's got another thing coming
I don't get mad
I get even
it's time we put the "Bluedog Democrats" on the endangered species list
Posted by: freepatriot | July 02, 2007 at 18:44
Our country is a dictatorship being run from a man-sized safe. It has to stop. Waxman, Leahy??? God knows, we can't turn to the Justice Department, which obviously was the plan all along.
Sponson, could you elaborate on your comment, "We are now going to see whether Patrick Fitzgerald is just a very skillful lawyer, or a principled instrument of Justice."? I'm not a lawyer, so I don't get what Fitzgerald's move could be.
Posted by: Jukesgrrl | July 02, 2007 at 18:44
geez this is sickening. not shocking, but sickening.
about that excessive 30 month sentence... i'm waiting for Bush is going to commute Gov. Siegelman's sentence. if 30 months is excessive, what's 7 years? so anytime now...
Posted by: irene | July 02, 2007 at 18:47
The shrub confesses and declares a general challenge to all those who are responsible for the administration of justice in the United States. It is the clearest test of Congress and the Courts.
Posted by: eladnar | July 02, 2007 at 18:48