by Plutonium Page
Over the past few weeks, we've been watching Michael Palin's excellent account of his journey through the Himalayas. In the opening scene, his helicopter lands on the Baltoro glacier in Concordia. It's incredible scenery, and you can see where the area gets its name, for "Himalaya" is Sanskrit for "The Abode of Snow".
However, there's something that you can't see unless you look at satellite images. Here's one of the Gangotri glacier:

That's right, folks. The great Himalayan glaciers are retreating at the alarming rate of 30-50 feet per year (10-15 meters).
Details below the fold.
For reference, here's a map of the Himalaya region:


Seventy percent of the worlds freshwater is frozen in glaciers. Glacier melt buffers other ecosystems against climate variability. Very often it provides the only source of water for humans and biodiversity during dry seasons. Freshwater is already a limited resource for much of the planet, and in the next three decades, the population growth is likely to far exceed any potential increase in available water.
The Himalayas have the largest concentration of glaciers outside the polar caps. With glacier coverage of 33,000 km2, the region is aptly called the “Water Tower of Asia” as it provides around 8.6 X 106 m3 of water annually (Dyurgerov and Maier, 1997). These Himalayan glaciers feed seven of Asia’s great rivers: the Ganga, Indus, Brahmaputra, Salween, Mekong, Yangtze and Huang Ho. It ensures a year round water supply to millions of people.
Climate change has impacted the glacial ecosystem tremendously. Sixty-seven percent of glaciers are retreating at a startling rate in the Himalayas and the major causal factor has been identified as climate change (Ageta and Kadota, 1992; Yamada et al., 1996; Fushinmi, 2000).
Glacial melt will affect freshwater flows with dramatic adverse effects on biodiversity, and people and livelihoods, with a possible long-term implication on regional food security.
The report specifies that the melting glaciers will first result in the increase in river volume, and consequential flooding. However, after a few decades, the volume of water in the rivers will decrease.
The Gangroti glacier (image above the fold) feeds India's Ganges river. The consequences of the declining water level of the Ganges would obviously be enormous.
NASA satellite imagery shows towns and cities affected by melting glaciers (click the image for higher resolution):

From all three case studies [Nepal, India, and China] one can gather the enormity of the predictions of retreating glaciers and associated impacts for the many millions of people whose very survival depends directly or indirectly on fresh water from these sources. While it is not yet clear which stage of deglaciation we are currently in, it is only wise to prepare for the worst. It is imperative to make vulnerability assessments of different development sectors and devise adaptation plans. Climate change impacts and responses are transboundary issues. Therefore, in addition to national discourses on linkage between climate change, mitigation and adaptation measures and development efforts, regional collaboration is necessary to formulate co-coordinated strategies.
The WWF news release regarding their report mentions that the WWF has sent a letter to the countries attending the "Energy and Environment Ministerial Round Table" as well as a G8 meeting focusing on climate change. Specifially, the WWF:
...calls on all governments to recognize that global average temperature must stay below 2°C (3.6°F) in comparison to pre-industrial levels, to agree upon a series of ambitious initiatives to vastly change the way their countries produce and use energy, and to launch a power sector governance initiative where all countries commit to practicing the principles of transparency, accountability and public participation in energy sector decision-making.
The United States is one of the governments attending the round table. Since we refused to acknowlege the Kyoto Protocol, the WWF letter must have gone into the Official Bush Administration Shredder.

I've really enjoyed your postings about this subject over at Kos --- they're one reason I was pleased to see you all start up your own blog because it makes it easier for me to find your collected data. :=D
It's really quite extraordinary to me that anyone could deny we're already feeling the effects of this stuff. But they do, thanks to an incredibly efficient and effective disinformation campaign by the right.
Case in point: I've lived in hot climates most of my life. One summer, however, while living a bit south of OKC (not by choice - I was attending grad school), temps reached 120+ for several days running, and sayed over 100 for I don't know how long --- weeks. I remember it clear as a bell --- it was unbelievable, everyone was suffering, people stopped going out in the day and did their grocery shopping, etc., at night.
Yet, those temps seem to have disappeared from the record, which I find even more bizarre. I tried to confirm them a year or so ago, and spent at least a day looking at meteorological etc records for Ok --- they were mentioned nowhere.
It was a year or so after that that we had the F5 tornados in the OKC area.
And just like heat, I've spent most of my life living with tornados --- but even I had never been through anything like that.
Think of the hurricanes in Florida over the last year or so. Etc. Change is definitely afoot, and to whose advantage is it? I can;t even believe that the corporations could consider it to their advantage to ignore what's going on.
In any case, I really do appreciate your postings on this and wanted to comment on them on your new blog.
Posted by: Cookie | March 14, 2005 at 17:18
GREAT!
We don't already have enough reasons to worry about turmoil in Pakistan, India, Nepal, Bangladesh, Afghanistan, the Central Asian republics, Tibet and the majority Muslim regions of China. Now we get to worry that they'll have enough water!
But you know, Page, there's no proof of global warming...
Posted by: DHinMI | March 14, 2005 at 17:21
Cookie: one factoid I picked up somewhere in the last few years (but can't remember where, so therefore no link)--in the last 20 or 30 years, the percentage of yearly rainfall that comes in heavy, concentrated rain has increased dramatically. Instead of getting steady, soaking rains, we're now more prone to intense rains that don't soak into the ground and are more likely to wash away topsoil. This is thought, as I remember the article, to be additional evidence of global climate change.
Posted by: DHinMI | March 14, 2005 at 17:25
The roof! The roof! The roof is... uh...
Posted by: Kagro X | March 14, 2005 at 17:29
Yep. I'm in the Ozarks now in the far eastern part of Ok now --- actually what we fondly refer to as Arklahoma :=D --- and I'm very familiar with the climate in this area, having spent much of my childhood in the region.
And we don't get steady rains here like we used to. Instead, we now have downpours lasting for hours and hours and hours.
Oh sure, we get some steady rains --- but the incidence of torrential downpours has really shot up.
Change is definitely already here and it's not good change. Which is one reason (of many) I am so baffled why anyone could deny this is happening, and why they would want to. We're all going to suffer from it.
Posted by: Cookie | March 14, 2005 at 17:30
Cookie wrote: We're all going to suffer from it.
Not those of us selected to be taken up at the Rapture.
You guys are all gonna be SOOOOOOO jealous...
Posted by: DHinMI | March 14, 2005 at 18:09
Judging from that first photo, the glacier started shrinking long before global warming was a significant issue. So what is causing this?
Posted by: fiat lux | March 15, 2005 at 02:13
mature vs young hard mature women vieille salope mature amatrice mature fuck young young boy and mature mature vieille mature salope mature young first time mature and young boy < mature old fuck mature woman fucking girl hot mature men mature woman asshole mature pics free grosses.femmesmuresx.com grosse femme mature hairy bush mature mature hot movies film mature fuck dogs mature black busty photo penetration femme mature hot nasty mature galerie nylon mature brune mature nu hot wife mature blowjob woman mature mature free galerie rencontre femme mure femme mure amatrice cochon photo de femme mure hard cum her face mature photo x femme mure femme mure pour jeune homme 19ans mature mom cum photo gratuite fellation femme mure age mure nu gratuite x femme mure femme mure tres poilue photo femme mure amateur exhib rencontre coquin femme mure > femme mure et nu gratuit mure femme mure avec jeune mec recette and confiture and and mure photo x femme mure et ronde photo de femme mure xxx femme mure nu photo photo gratuite vieille mature nu mature busty babe gallery nymphomane mature amatrice lady mature mature drunk suck vieille saint girons photo vieille salope gratuit mature collant nylon galerie gratuite mature mature and granny mature lady posing femme amatrice mature vieille salope .com pipe hard concert hard rock berlin hard rock cafe black orchid rock nantes hard audrey tautou film hard archive journal hard pps hard ecoute musique hard rock couple hard roman photo hard film and x and hard photo hard de brigitte lahaie music hard core teen hard preview hard top nissan navara hard and top rencontre hard gratuite pps hard gratuit hard anal fucking photo gratuite femme hard peugeot dangel 505 hard top dvd x hard discount sodomie hard amateur pps humour hard liste hard discount essonne mature riding hard hard tv net hard xxx gratuit
Posted by: Frankeynstain | June 28, 2006 at 08:18
Roof of world is melting but who cares, At least decision makers od South Asia are not interested to listen the latest findings of WWF report on Siachen Glacers. Please Click the link
http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2007%5C02%5C13%5Cstory_13-2-2007_pg3_3
Siachen madness or mountain peace —Q Isa Daudpota and Arshad H Abbasi
It is for opinion-makers in India and Pakistan to tell their respective governments to stop ruining the future of our water supplies and our weather system. Bringing their troops down from the inhospitable heights of Siachen would be the first step. This would be welcomed by the troops as well as the mountain wildlife that has been displaced by the war
Back in 2003 one of us (QID) signed an email petition titled the Siachen Peace Park Initiative located at the glacier that bears this name. It had to do with getting India and Pakistan to withdraw from the futile conflict in the mountains and to let nature revert to its snowy tranquillity.
“As part of the normalisation process/confidence building measures, the governments of India and Pakistan are urged to establish a Siachen Peace Park to protect and restore the spectacular landscapes which are home to so many endangered species including the snow leopard.” This was the statement adopted as a lead-up to the 5th World Parks Congress held in September 2003 at Durban, South Africa.
The petition was a follow-up to win widespread support for the idea from citizens of India, Pakistan and around the world, so that the Indian and Pakistani governments could move forward without loss of face, or strategic liability. Sadly there has been no progress in resolving this decades-old dispute.
But new strongly worded reports from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) released on Feb 2 this year could perhaps make the decision-makers change their minds about this wasteful, futile conflict. The IPCC forecasts that global temperatures would rise by 1.8 to 4.0 Celsius this century. There are already signs that South Asia will be one of the worst affected regions — monsoon affected with reduced agriculture production, sinking of island communities and increase in vector borne diseases.
Here, however, we will mainly consider the impact of human presence and war on the glaciers of this region and the impact of this on the region and globally. Note that melting of the Himalayan glaciers contributes about 25 percent to the sea-rise globally.
A serious unforeseen consequence of the Siachen war is the danger posed to four other glaciers: Gangotri, Miyar, Milan and Janapa, which feed the rivers Ganges (first two glaciers), Chenab and Sutlej respectively. This is because of the heavy traffic on the Indian road from the plains to Siachen passing near these four glaciers on the Delhi-Manali-Leh route. This finding is corroborated by a recent report by one of us (AHA) for the Worldwide Fund for Nature (WWF), available at
http://tinyurl.com/23b5de
According to Prof M N Kaul, Principal Investigator on glaciology in the Indian Department of Science and Technology, “the ecology, the environment and the health of the glacier can be under severe threat in case the Baltal route to the holy Amarnath cave was frequented by thousands of pilgrims.”
Mr Kaul said that heavy pilgrim traffic besides mountain expeditions result in depletion of glacier and environmental degradation. He explained that “this depletion and degradation are the result of human breath, refuse and land erosion.”
When these pilgrims can cause so much damage to the glaciers, imagine what the continual presence of troops from both countries must do to the ice and snow given their high-energy requirement.
Science bureaucrats who wish to be totally ‘objective’ can often be very conservative in their assessment of complex phenomenon that require immediate attention and action. Often a watertight assessment is not feasible and decision ought to be based on the “precaution principle”.
Unlike Prof Kaul, Dr Rajendra Pachauri, director-general of The Energy and Resources Institute, is quoted as saying: “A number of scientists say Siachen should be made a protected area, a heritage site of sorts, and that there should be no army presence on either side. For purely ecological reasons, this might be a good idea. But I don’t see why there would be melting as a result of military presence and activity.” Italics are added to show a lack of conviction in supporting an end to armed conflict at Siachen.
But Dr Pachauri holds an even more important position as the chairman of the IPCC. Launching the finding of the international report on Feb 2nd, he strongly emphasised the cost and danger if there is no action taken on reducing greenhouse emissions which, among other things, melt glaciers.
Research about the Gangotri, India’s largest glacier — which feeds the Ganges — has found that the rate of retreat has almost doubled to 34 meter per year compared to what it was in 1971.
The melting of Himalayan glaciers could have serious consequences as more than 500 million residents of the Indus, Ganges and Brahmaputra river basins rely on them for water supply.
As with Gangotri, so with Siachen the increasing melting can be largely attributed to human activities in these areas. In Siachen, which provides water to the Nubra River, a tributary of the Indus, the ecosystem has been hugely disturbed by the presence of nearly 15000 troops on its two sides, consuming and defecating, soiling the area and littering it with the remains of war. Much of this debris will flow into our river Indus as the glacier melts.
India airlifts food and vital supplies to supplement material that goes up on an all-weather road. Fuel needed for daily needs of cooking and keeping warm is provided by India through a 250 km long pipeline. Vehicular traffic and the heat generated from the activities on this 21,000 ft high glacier has led to unprecedented melting and diminishing of this 72 km-long glacier. Currently temperature rise in the area is recorded as 0.2 degrees Celsius annually, resulting in destructive snow avalanches, formation of glacial lakes and snow holes.
Note that Pakistani troops lie on the western side of the Saltoro ridge, which essentially runs north-south, while Indians are on the eastern side. This is where the Siachen glacier is. Due to much lower activity on the Pakistani side the western glaciers are stable, as shown by recent independent studies by researchers from the UK and Italy.
Unfortunately, climate ‘experts’ in Pakistan seem to lack knowledge of the importance of glaciers for our ecosystem. In 2001, some of them associated with the Global Climate Change Impact Studies Centre in Islamabad suggested that glaciers be melted artificially (by lasers or darkening) to alleviate the drought in the plains! This Centre was set up by old hands of the Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission. It took one of their own colleagues, Dr Khalid Rashid, to debunk in a conference paper their suggestions, which he labelled as science fiction!
Glaciers can also be made secure by the use of common sense. It is for opinion-makers in India and Pakistan to tell their respective governments to stop ruining the future of our water supplies and our weather system. Bringing their troops down from the inhospitable heights of Siachen would be the first step. This would be welcomed by the troops as well as the mountain wildlife that has been displaced by the war.
The authors are Islamabad-based environmentalists
Posted by: Moosa | February 18, 2007 at 05:19
elqwuf gzkmq avirsfy erqvkcayb kqrathg zmjp kvncpxlou
Posted by: cbjzeq snhg | September 13, 2007 at 18:46
uqwjricn cnbj ghfoq agyleozi hazqpg chqlyodaw rjax http://www.slbrnj.plbhw.com
Posted by: uthqxlj jksrhu | September 13, 2007 at 18:46